Manage US stocks, Korean stocks, and ETFs in one place and auto-rebalance to your target allocation
Real-time US & KR stock prices
Auto buy/sell calculation
Cloud sync supported
Investment Strategy2026-02-09
TLT vs. Ief Bond ETF Strategy
The performance gap between long-duration TLT and intermediate-duration IEF is widening. While TLT has averaged a -7% annual loss over five years, IEF has gained 23% so far this year, showing a stark contrast. This article analyzes how to use these two bond ETFs strategically.
Admin
As bond markets enter a complex phase, the choice between TLT (20+ year long-term Treasuries) and IEF (7–10 year intermediate Treasuries) has become a key issue for ETF investors. TLT currently trades at $87.54 with a dividend yield of 4.43%, yet its 5-year annualized return sits at -7.06%. By contrast, IEF at $96.07 has posted a remarkable 23.2% year-to-date return, demonstrating the appeal of intermediate-term bonds. This article examines why duration selection is so critical when constructing a bond portfolio.
Key Differences Between TLT and IEF
TLT invests in 47 U.S. Treasury bonds with maturities of 20 years or more, making it highly sensitive to interest rate movements. It has $44.8 billion in assets under management, an expense ratio of 0.15%, and a beta of 0.56. IEF holds 19 Treasury securities with maturities of 7 to 10 years and manages $46.6 billion in assets, slightly larger than TLT. The essential difference lies in duration (interest rate sensitivity). TLT has a duration of approximately 16 years, while IEF's is around 7 years — meaning a 1% change in rates produces roughly a 16% price move for TLT and about 7% for IEF.
Rate Cycles and Bond ETF Selection
In a rate-cutting cycle, longer-duration TLT tends to outperform, while IEF offers greater stability during periods of rate uncertainty. The current market balances expectations of further Fed rate cuts against lingering inflation concerns. IEF's 23.2% return this year reflects a decline in intermediate-term rates, while TLT's 1.75% annual return indicates that long-term rates remain elevated. AGG covers both segments of the bond market and has delivered a steady 6.39% return, making it a balanced alternative for investors who prefer not to take a strong directional bet on duration.
Comparing Dividend Income
TLT's dividend yield of 4.43% is higher than IEF's 3.79%. Both ETFs distribute dividends monthly, making them suitable for investors seeking regular cash flow. TLT pays approximately $0.32 per month and IEF approximately $0.31. AGG also sits in the middle with a 3.88% yield. Bond ETF dividend income is subject to a 15% U.S. withholding tax, so investors should compare yields on an after-tax basis when calculating effective returns. An asset allocation calculator can help simulate bond weightings and projected dividend income simultaneously.
Optimal Bond ETF Allocation Strategy for 2026
In the current market environment, a recommended bond portfolio composition is 40% IEF, 40% AGG, and 20% TLT. IEF captures gains from declining intermediate-term rates, AGG provides broad diversification across the entire bond market, and TLT is held as a small position to benefit from any sharp drop in long-term rates. Using a rebalancing calculator to review bond weightings quarterly and dynamically adjusting the TLT-to-IEF ratio based on rate direction is an effective approach. Within the overall portfolio, a bond allocation of 20–40% is appropriate depending on the investor's age and risk tolerance.
Conclusion
The choice between TLT and IEF ultimately depends on your rate outlook and investment horizon. If you have strong conviction that rates will fall, TLT's higher duration works in your favor; if uncertainty is high, IEF's moderate duration is the safer choice. For most investors, the optimal strategy is to use AGG as the core holding with IEF and TLT as complementary positions. Use a rebalancing calculator and an asset allocation calculator to design the bond weighting that fits your own goals.
