Monetary Policy2025-11-04
Fed Rate Decision Imminent: Time to Reassess Bond ETF Duration Strategy
Market volatility is rising ahead of the Federal Reserve's rate policy decision. With the 10-year Treasury yield climbing to 4.3%, long-duration bond ETF TLT is underperforming, while intermediate-term bond ETF IEF remains relatively stable. Use the rebalancing calculator to adjust your bond portfolio duration.
AdminCNBC
Bond markets are on edge ahead of the Federal Reserve's November policy meeting. The 10-year Treasury yield has climbed to 4.3%, up 40 basis points from September, and investor sentiment toward long-duration bonds has deteriorated. TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) fell -3.2% on a monthly basis, while IEF (iShares 7-10 Year Treasury Bond ETF) declined only -1.5%, clearly highlighting duration risk. Bond investors should use the asset allocation calculator to reset their target duration and review TLT vs. IEF weighting adjustments with the rebalancing calculator.
Fed Rate Path and Shifting Market Expectations
Markets widely expect the Fed to hold rates steady at its November meeting, but opinions diverge on the likelihood of additional cuts in the first half of 2025. According to CME FedWatch, the probability of a December rate cut has fallen sharply to 38% from 62% a month ago. Inflation has remained more stubborn than expected, with the PCE price index running at +2.7% year-over-year — above the Fed's 2% target — while core PCE also sits at an elevated +2.9%. The labor market continues to hold firm, with unemployment at 3.8% and hourly wages up +4.2% year-over-year, sustaining inflationary pressure. Economic growth has exceeded expectations, with Q3 GDP printing at an annualized +4.9%, raising concerns about an overheating economy; robust consumer spending has further reduced the urgency for rate cuts. In this environment, upward pressure on long-term yields persists, with the 10-year yield rising to 4.3% — up 40 bps from 3.9% at the start of the year — and the 30-year yield climbing to 4.5%, diminishing the attractiveness of long-duration bonds. Bond investors must reassess duration risk: TLT (average duration 17 years) loses approximately -17% for every 1% rise in rates, making it a high-risk asset; IEF (average duration 8 years) loses approximately -8% for the same rate move, roughly half the risk; and AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF, duration 6 years) loses approximately -6%, making it the most stable option. Investors should use the asset allocation calculator to compare the duration risk and expected returns of TLT, IEF, and AGG — and adopt a dynamic strategy that shifts toward IEF or AGG during rate-rising periods, then increases TLT exposure when rates begin to fall.
TLT vs. IEF Performance Comparison and Investment Strategy
The performance divergence between TLT and IEF has been pronounced over the past three months. TLT fell from $98 in early September to $94 in early November, a decline of -4.1%; including dividends of +0.9%, the total return was -3.2%. IEF dropped from $103 to $101.50 over the same period, a decline of -1.5%; including dividends of +0.6%, the total return was -0.9%, meaningfully outpacing TLT. AGG slipped from $100 to $99.20, a decline of -0.8%; including dividends of +0.7%, the total return was virtually flat at -0.1%. Looking at the risk-return profile by duration: TLT follows a high-risk, high-return strategy — it offers the greatest upside when rates fall but also the largest losses when they rise, with annualized volatility of 15–20%, comparable to equities. It is unsuitable for investors approaching retirement (60s) and appropriate only for aggressive investors with strong conviction on rate direction. IEF represents a balanced, moderate-risk strategy — its sensitivity to rate moves is roughly half that of TLT, with annualized volatility of 8–12% that most bond investors can tolerate. It is well-suited for investors in the asset-accumulation phase (40s–50s) and can serve as the core anchor of a bond portfolio. AGG is a low-risk, stability-oriented strategy — it blends corporates, MBS, and Treasuries for superior diversification, with a duration of 6 years carrying the least interest-rate risk and annualized volatility of 5–8%, the lowest among bond ETFs. It is ideal for retirees (70s and older) or conservative investors seeking a safe-haven role in their portfolio. By rate scenario: if rates rise further (above 4.5%), expand AGG to 50–60% to minimize losses, reduce IEF to 30–40%, and cut TLT to 0–10% to minimize duration; if rates stabilize (4.0–4.5%), maintain IEF at 40–50% for balance, hold AGG at 30–40%, and keep TLT at 10–20% for diversification; if rates fall (below 4.0%), expand TLT to 30–40% to maximize gains, hold IEF at 30–40%, and reduce AGG to 20–30% for an aggressive posture. Use the rebalancing calculator to review current TLT, IEF, and AGG weightings and adjust targets based on your rate outlook; use the asset allocation calculator to simulate losses and expected returns under TLT 30% vs. IEF 50% vs. AGG 60% scenarios for a 1% rate increase, and build a duration strategy aligned with your individual risk tolerance.
Corporate Bond vs. Treasury Spread Analysis
The spread between corporate bonds and Treasuries remains near historical lows. Investment-grade corporate bond spreads stand at +95 bps over Treasuries, well below the 5-year average of +120 bps, suggesting corporate bond valuations have entered overvalued territory. High-yield spreads are at +320 bps over Treasuries, also below the 10-year average of +450 bps, indicating very low credit risk premiums. This reflects a low corporate default rate in the current economic expansion and strong investor risk appetite driving robust demand for corporate bonds. Regarding corporate bond ETF strategy: LQD (iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF), with a duration of 8.5 years and a dividend yield of 4.8%, offers limited additional price appreciation given tight spreads and could suffer larger losses than Treasury ETFs if rates rise. At this juncture, reducing existing exposure rather than initiating new positions — and re-entering when spreads widen back to +120 bps or above — is the more prudent approach. HYG (iShares iBoxx High Yield Corporate Bond ETF), with a duration of 4 years and a dividend yield of 6.5%, carries significant principal-loss risk due to surging default rates in a recession; the current spread of +320 bps is near historical lows, limiting further upside. It should be classified as a high-risk asset, capped at no more than 5% of the portfolio, and liquidated immediately at the first signs of an economic downturn. Compared to AGG, corporate bond ETFs offer the advantage of higher yields — LQD at 4.8% and HYG at 6.5% vs. AGG at 3.8% — making them attractive for income investors; spreads can compress further during economic expansions for additional price gains, and corporate bonds may be more tax-efficient than Treasuries in some cases. On the downside, credit risk introduces the possibility of principal loss in the event of corporate defaults, with less stability than AGG (Treasury-focused); liquidity risk means corporate ETFs can be difficult to sell in sharp market downturns, amplifying losses; and valuation risk limits further upside given tight spreads, with greater losses than Treasuries in a rate-rising environment. Conservative bond investors should prioritize stability with an AGG 70% / IEF 30% combination and exclude corporate ETFs entirely; balanced investors can seek a blend of income and stability with AGG 50% / IEF 30% / LQD 20%; and aggressive investors can maximize income while managing credit risk with IEF 40% / LQD 40% / HYG 20%. Use the rebalancing calculator to redirect excess corporate ETF weightings into AGG or IEF, and use the asset allocation calculator to simulate credit risk and dividend income across AGG vs. LQD vs. HYG allocations to determine the appropriate corporate bond exposure for your investment objectives.
Inflation-Linked Bond (TIPS) Strategy
With inflation running above the Fed's target, demand for TIPS (Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities) is increasing. TIP (iShares TIPS Bond ETF), which invests in U.S. inflation-linked Treasuries, has a duration of 7.5 years and a dividend yield of 4.2% (real yield plus inflation adjustment); its principal is indexed to CPI, providing inflation protection. How TIPS work: the face value increases by the inflation rate, so a $1,000 bond adjusts to $1,030 when CPI rises 3%; interest is paid on the adjusted face value — at a real yield of 2%, that means $1,030 × 2% = $20.60 in interest — and at maturity, the adjusted principal is repaid, protecting purchasing power against inflation. Compared to nominal Treasuries, TIPS advantages include: inflation hedging, as principal and interest automatically adjust upward with rising prices, preserving real purchasing power; outperformance relative to nominal Treasuries in high-inflation environments; and lower volatility than nominal bonds, offering more stability during inflation shocks. Disadvantages include: deflation risk, where falling prices reduce principal and can produce negative returns; lower liquidity than nominal Treasuries (TLT, IEF), making them harder to sell; and complex tax treatment, since inflation adjustments to principal are taxable, reducing after-tax returns. Current investment environment analysis: the breakeven inflation rate for 10-year TIPS is 2.3% (nominal yield of 4.3% minus real yield of 2.0%); since the current inflation rate of 2.7% exceeds the breakeven, TIPS are currently advantageous; and if inflation is expected to remain above 2.3%, TIPS remain attractive. TIPS investment strategy: expand TIP allocation to 20–30% when inflation is expected to run above 2.5%; reduce TIP allocation to 0–10% when inflation is expected to fall below 2.0%; and hedge inflation risk by allocating 10–20% of the bond portfolio to TIP. Sample portfolio constructions: Conservative — AGG 50% / IEF 30% / TIP 20%, balancing stability with inflation protection; Balanced — IEF 40% / TIP 30% / LQD 30%, simultaneously securing inflation hedging and income; Inflation-focused — TIP 50% / IEF 30% / AGG 20%, prioritizing inflation defense. Use the rebalancing calculator to set a TIP target weight (e.g., 20%) and adjust within a 15–25% range as inflation changes; use the asset allocation calculator to simulate real returns under 10% vs. 20% vs. 30% TIP allocations in a scenario of sustained 3% inflation, and determine the appropriate TIP weighting based on your level of inflation concern.
Practical Bond Portfolio Rebalancing Strategy
In an environment of heightened rate volatility, rebalancing a bond portfolio is essential. Key rebalancing principles: set a duration band by establishing a target duration (e.g., 7 years) with a ±1-year band (6–8 years); note that when rates rise and TLT prices fall, the portfolio duration shortens automatically, but TLT's weight may increase, so monitor carefully; and recalculate portfolio duration quarterly, rebalancing whenever it drifts outside the band. Response by rate scenario: on a sharp rate spike (+0.5 pp or more), cut TLT allocation in half and replace with AGG or short-term Treasury ETF (SHY) to prevent further losses; on a sharp rate drop (-0.5 pp or more), increase IEF and gradually add to TLT to maximize gains; and when rates are range-bound (±0.2 pp), maintain target weights and focus on reinvesting dividends. Practical rebalancing example: starting portfolio of KRW 100M (TLT KRW 20M at 20%, IEF KRW 40M at 40%, AGG KRW 30M at 30%, cash KRW 10M at 10%), with a target duration of 7.5 years (TLT 17yr × 20% + IEF 8yr × 40% + AGG 6yr × 30% = 7.5yr). After three months, rates rise +0.4 pp: TLT at $93 (-7%), IEF at $101 (-2%), AGG at $99 (-1%), bringing the portfolio to KRW 96.2M (TLT KRW 18.6M at 19.3%, IEF KRW 39.2M at 40.7%, AGG KRW 29.7M at 30.9%, cash KRW 10M at 10.4%). The portfolio duration remains 7.5 years, but given the risk of further rate increases, a rebalancing is executed: TLT is trimmed from 20% to 10%, bringing it to KRW 9.62M with KRW 8.98M sold; IEF is increased from 40% to 45%, bringing it to KRW 43.29M with KRW 4.09M purchased; AGG is increased from 30% to 35%, bringing it to KRW 33.67M with KRW 3.97M purchased; and cash is maintained at 10%, bringing it to KRW 9.62M funded by TLT proceeds. Post-rebalancing portfolio: TLT KRW 9.62M (10%), IEF KRW 43.29M (45%), AGG KRW 33.67M (35%), cash KRW 9.62M (10%). Portfolio duration falls to 6.9 years (TLT 17yr × 10% + IEF 8yr × 45% + AGG 6yr × 35% = 6.9yr), reducing interest-rate risk. The rebalancing benefits: reducing TLT cuts potential losses on further rate increases by approximately 50%; increasing IEF and AGG improves stability and slightly boosts dividend income (AGG carries a higher yield); and shortening duration from 7.5 to 6.9 years improves the loss from a 1% rate rise from -7.5% to -6.9%. Use the rebalancing calculator to input current and target weights for TLT, IEF, and AGG, and calculate losses and rebalancing needs across rate scenarios; use the asset allocation calculator to simulate losses and dividend income for 6-year vs. 7-year vs. 8-year duration portfolios under a 1% rate increase, and construct an optimal bond portfolio aligned with your rate outlook and risk tolerance — then rebalance regularly to manage interest-rate risk.
Conclusion
As uncertainty over the Fed's rate policy persists, bond investors should carefully reassess their duration strategy. TLT is appropriate only when there is strong conviction that rates will fall; IEF serves as the core anchor of a balanced portfolio; and AGG is best suited for investors who prioritize stability above all else. Use the rebalancing calculator to adjust bond ETF weightings in response to rate changes, and use the asset allocation calculator to derive the optimal combination of TLT, IEF, and AGG to effectively manage interest-rate risk. It is also important to consider inflation hedging via TIPS and the credit risk inherent in corporate bond ETFs to enhance overall portfolio stability.
Related Portfolios
#[KO] 리밸런싱 계산기#[KO] 자산배분 계산기#TLT vs IEF#AGG ETF#[KO] 연준 금리
Related Articles
Have any questions?