Investment Strategy2025-11-04
Dividend Growth Stocks Rally: SCHD ETF Delivers Steady Returns
Dividend growth stocks are delivering stable performance amid market volatility. SCHD (Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF) has posted an 8% price gain alongside a 3.5% dividend yield, demonstrating a solid balance of income and growth. Use the rebalancing calculator to review your dividend portfolio.
AdminCNBC
As market volatility rises, dividend growth stocks are drawing increasing investor attention. SCHD (Schwab US Dividend Equity ETF) has risen +8% year-to-date, trailing the S&P 500 (+22%), but delivered a total return of +11.5% including dividend income of +3.5%, posting a stable track record. In particular, by investing in high-quality companies with 10 or more consecutive years of dividend growth, SCHD achieves an annual dividend growth rate of +12% and demonstrates strong defensive characteristics—limiting losses to -7% during the 2022 bear market compared to -18% for the S&P 500. For investors in their 50s and 60s preparing for retirement, SCHD is an optimal choice that simultaneously provides stable income and capital appreciation. Use the asset allocation calculator to optimize your SCHD weighting, and the rebalancing calculator to build your dividend reinvestment strategy.
SCHD ETF Structure and Investment Philosophy
SCHD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, investing in 100 U.S. companies with 10 or more consecutive years of dividend growth. Selection criteria include dividend continuity—a mandatory track record of at least 10 consecutive years of dividend increases—and only companies that maintained their dividends through the 2008 financial crisis and the 2020 pandemic are included. For financial health, SCHD screens for companies in the top tier by ROE (return on equity), prioritizes those with low debt-to-equity ratios and sufficient capacity to pay dividends, and selects companies with stable cash flows capable of sustaining dividends over time. For dividend yield, companies with yields at least double the S&P 500 average (1.3%) are selected, while excessively high dividends (above 7%) are excluded to prioritize dividend sustainability. Looking at top holdings: Best Buy (retail) at 4.2% is the leading electronics retailer with a dividend yield of 5.0% and 20 consecutive years of dividend growth; BlackRock (financials) at 4.0% is the world's largest asset manager with a dividend yield of 2.8% and 14 consecutive years of dividend growth. Cisco (technology) at 3.8% is the leading network equipment company with a dividend yield of 3.2% and 12 consecutive years of dividend growth; Coca-Cola (consumer staples) at 3.5% is the world's top beverage company with a dividend yield of 3.0% and a remarkable 62 consecutive years of dividend growth. Pfizer (healthcare) at 3.3% is a global pharmaceutical giant with a dividend yield of 6.0% and 14 consecutive years of dividend growth. By sector, the fund is allocated 25% to financials (banks, insurance, asset management), 18% to healthcare (pharmaceuticals, medical devices), and 15% to consumer staples (food and household products). Industrials make up 12% (manufacturing and transportation), technology 10% centered on mature large-cap tech names (Cisco, IBM), energy 8% (oil and gas companies), and utilities and telecom round out the remaining 12%. The expense ratio of 0.06% is among the lowest for dividend ETFs; the dividend yield of 3.5% is 2.7x higher than the S&P 500 (1.3%); and the annual dividend growth rate of +12% far exceeds inflation (+3%), meaning real dividends continue to increase. In 2025, the price appreciation of +8% lags the S&P 500 (+22%) but comes with lower volatility; the total return including dividends is a stable +11.5%; and the annualized volatility of 10% is roughly half that of the S&P 500 (18%), reducing psychological stress. The investment philosophy behind SCHD emphasizes a balance of dividends and growth—it does not chase high yields alone (tobacco and REITs are excluded) but prioritizes dividend growth potential. The combination of a current yield of 3.5% and growth of +12% produces excellent long-term compounding: if held for 10 years, the effective yield on cost rises to 10.8% (compounded), which is sufficient to cover living expenses in retirement. In terms of defensive characteristics, consumer staples, healthcare, and utilities account for 45% of the portfolio, defending against losses in an economic downturn. In the 2022 bear market, SCHD fell -7% versus -18% for the S&P 500—less than half the loss. Financials and industrials also account for 37%, capturing upside in an economic recovery. Only companies with ROE above 15% are included, ensuring superior profitability; low debt ratios keep dividend-paying capacity stable; and consistent cash flow sustainability is verified before inclusion. Use the rebalancing calculator to set your target SCHD allocation (e.g., 20%), redistribute any excess when dividend reinvestment causes the weighting to increase, and use the asset allocation calculator to simulate dividend income and total returns for scenarios of 15%, 20%, and 25% SCHD allocations—then determine the optimal SCHD weighting that fits your income needs and growth objectives.
SCHD vs VYM vs DGRO: Comparing Dividend ETFs
Beyond SCHD, the dividend ETF market features other major products such as VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) and DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF). VYM offers diversified exposure to 440 high-dividend-paying companies. Its expense ratio of 0.06% matches SCHD, and its 3.0% dividend yield is lower than SCHD's 3.5%, but the larger number of holdings provides superior diversification. Top holdings include JPMorgan at 3.5%, ExxonMobil at 3.2%, and Johnson & Johnson at 2.8%; sector allocation is 22% financials, 14% healthcare, and 11% consumer staples. In 2025, VYM delivered a total return of +10% (price +7% plus dividends +3.0%) at an annualized volatility of 12%, which is higher than SCHD's 10%. VYM's strengths include excellent diversification across 440 holdings that reduces single-company risk, stability from its large-cap focus, and strong credibility from the Vanguard brand. Its drawbacks are a dividend growth rate of +8% that lags SCHD's +12%, limiting long-term compounding, higher exposure to declining industries such as tobacco and oil that raises questions about long-term growth, and weaker dividend-continuity standards compared to SCHD's requirement of 10 consecutive years of dividend growth. DGRO invests in 400 dividend-growth companies. Its expense ratio of 0.08% is slightly above SCHD's 0.06%; its dividend yield of 2.5% is lower than SCHD's 3.5%, but its dividend growth rate of +15% is the highest of the three. Top holdings include Microsoft at 7.2%, Apple at 6.5%, and JPMorgan at 4.8%, reflecting significant big-tech exposure; the sector mix is 25% technology, 18% financials, and 13% healthcare, making it more growth-oriented. In 2025, DGRO delivered a total return of +20.5% (price +18% plus dividends +2.5%) at an annualized volatility of 16%, higher than SCHD's 10%. DGRO's strengths include the highest dividend growth rate of +15% for superior long-term compounding, significant big-tech exposure that enhances price appreciation potential, and an effective yield on cost after 10 years of 10.1% (compounded) that converges with SCHD's 10.8% despite a lower starting yield. Its drawbacks include a current yield of only 2.5% that makes it difficult to immediately fund living expenses in retirement, high big-tech exposure that introduces valuation risk, and annualized volatility of 16% that is high for a dividend ETF, increasing psychological pressure. In a side-by-side comparison: expense ratios are SCHD 0.06%, VYM 0.06%, DGRO 0.08%; dividend yields are SCHD 3.5%, VYM 3.0%, DGRO 2.5%; dividend growth rates are SCHD +12%, VYM +8%, DGRO +15%; number of holdings are SCHD 100, VYM 440, DGRO 400; volatility is SCHD 10%, VYM 12%, DGRO 16%; and 2025 total returns are SCHD +11.5%, VYM +10%, DGRO +20.5%. In terms of investor fit, SCHD suits investors approaching retirement (50s and 60s) who want a balance of current income (3.5%) and dividend growth (+12%), and is the best choice for conservative investors seeking minimum volatility (10%) and who prioritize the dividend sustainability of financially sound companies. VYM suits investors seeking maximum diversification (440 holdings) to minimize single-company risk, those who prioritize large-cap stability to reduce volatility, and conservative investors for whom current income (3.0%) matters but growth is less of a priority. DGRO suits younger investors (30s and 40s) who prioritize long-term dividend growth over current income, aggressive investors seeking price appreciation potential through big-tech exposure, and those willing to tolerate higher volatility (16%) to maximize long-term total returns. Sample portfolio combination strategies: a conservative (60s) allocation of SCHD 50%, VYM 30%, AGG 20% prioritizes current income and stability; a balanced (50s) allocation of SCHD 40%, DGRO 30%, QQQ 20%, AGG 10% seeks equilibrium among income, growth, and stability; an aggressive (40s) allocation of DGRO 30%, QQQ 50%, SCHD 10%, AGG 10% prioritizes long-term growth while adding dividend stability. Use the rebalancing calculator to input current and target weights for SCHD, VYM, and DGRO and redistribute any excess from dividend reinvestment, and use the asset allocation calculator to simulate dividend income and volatility for SCHD alone versus SCHD+VYM and SCHD+DGRO combinations—then build the optimal dividend ETF mix suited to your age, income needs, and risk tolerance, and rebalance regularly.
Dividend Reinvestment Strategy and the Power of Compounding
Dividend reinvestment is the cornerstone strategy for long-term wealth accumulation. To illustrate the compounding effect with SCHD: if you currently hold 100 shares at $80 per share, your position is worth $8,000 and you receive an annual dividend of $280 ($2.80 per share at a 3.5% yield). Reinvesting that $280 buys an additional 3.5 shares of SCHD (at $80), so after year one you hold 103.5 shares. With a dividend growth rate of +12%, the per-share dividend rises from $2.80 to $3.14, making year-two dividend income $325 (103.5 shares × $3.14). Reinvesting that $325 buys another 4.1 shares, bringing your total to 107.6 shares after two years. As this compounding accumulates over time, your 100 shares grow to 238 shares after 10 years, and annual dividend income expands from $280 to $2,053—a 7.3-fold increase. Total assets grow from $8,000 to $27,300, a 3.4x increase (assuming an average annual price appreciation of +8%), and the compounding effect produces an average annual return of approximately price appreciation +8% + dividend yield +3.5% + reinvestment effect +2% = +13.5%. Compare this to not reinvesting dividends: if dividends are received as cash and spent, you still hold 100 shares after 10 years, accumulated dividend income of $6,200 has been withdrawn and consumed, and total assets stand at $17,200 (reflecting price appreciation only). The reinvestment scenario yields $27,300 versus $17,200 without reinvestment—a difference of $10,100 (59%)—underscoring the decisive role dividend reinvestment plays in long-term wealth building. In terms of practical reinvestment methods, most U.S. brokerages (Schwab, Fidelity, Interactive Brokers) offer DRIP (Dividend Reinvestment Programs) that automatically purchase additional ETF shares on the dividend payment date, eliminating manual effort. Fractional share purchases are supported (e.g., 3.5 shares), allowing 100% of the dividend to be deployed with no purchase commissions. Korean brokerages (Kiwoom, Samsung Securities, etc.) generally do not support DRIP, requiring manual reinvestment—you purchase additional SCHD shares manually when dividends are credited to your account. Fractional share purchases are typically unavailable, making reinvestment difficult when dividend amounts are small, and a purchase commission (~0.3%) applies, increasing costs. On the question of reinvestment versus cash withdrawal: investors in the wealth-accumulation phase (40s and 50s) should reinvest 100% of dividends to maximize compounding; if living expenses are fully covered and dividend income is not needed, full reinvestment is appropriate; and the compounding effect is most powerful over a 10–20 year horizon. Investors in the pre-retirement phase (mid-50s to 60) might reinvest 50% of dividends and withdraw the other 50% as cash, partially funding retirement living expenses while continuing to grow assets, then gradually increase the withdrawal ratio until 100% is withdrawn at retirement. Post-retirement (age 65+), dividends are fully withdrawn to cover living expenses, combined with pension and social security income to meet daily costs, with income generation taking priority over asset growth. Regarding the tax implications of dividend reinvestment: U.S. dividend withholding tax is 15%, so on a $280 dividend, $42 (15%) is withheld, leaving $238 to be reinvested—enough to buy 3.0 shares instead of 3.5, meaning the tax effect reduces reinvestment efficiency by 15%. In Korea, dividend income up to 20 million KRW is taxed at a flat rate of 15.4% (including local tax), while income above that threshold is subject to comprehensive income tax (up to 49.5%), so managing dividend receipts to stay below 20 million KRW per year maximizes tax efficiency. Tax-efficient strategies include using an ISA (Individual Savings Account), which offers a tax-exempt dividend income limit of 2 million KRW (4 million KRW for lower-income accounts), allowing a portion of SCHD dividends received within the ISA to be tax-free; pension savings accounts defer dividend income tax, boosting reinvestment efficiency, but withdrawals are subject to pension income tax (3.3%–5.5%), making long-term holding preferable. Use the rebalancing calculator to redistribute excess when dividend reinvestment pushes SCHD's weighting above your target, and use the asset allocation calculator to simulate total assets and dividend income after 10 years for dividend-reinvestment versus non-reinvestment scenarios—then build the optimal dividend reinvestment strategy suited to your age, income needs, and tax situation to maximize the power of compounding.
Economic Cycles and Timing Dividend Stock Investments
Dividend stocks perform differently at different stages of the economic cycle. During the expansion phase (2020–2021), growth stocks significantly outperformed dividend stocks: the Nasdaq rose +43%, the S&P 500 +27%, and SCHD +22%—dividend stocks lagged in relative terms. The low-rate environment reduced the appeal of dividends, causing investors to prefer high-growth technology stocks, and cyclically sensitive sectors (technology and consumer discretionary) led the market. During the late-cycle and contraction phase (2022), dividend stocks proved their defensive value: the S&P 500 fell -18%, the Nasdaq -33%, while SCHD fell only -7%, dramatically limiting losses. Rising interest rates caused growth stock valuations to plummet, highlighting the stability of dividend stocks, and defensive sectors (consumer staples, healthcare) held up well amid concerns about an economic slowdown. During the recovery phase (2023–2025), dividend stocks delivered balanced returns: the S&P 500 rose +58%, the Nasdaq +80%, and SCHD +32%—dividend stocks trailed growth stocks but still provided stable gains. Dividend growth of +12% accumulated compounding benefits, improving long-term total returns, and lower volatility provided psychological reassurance. Assessing the current economic phase (November 2025): GDP growth of +2.1% signals late-cycle conditions with early signs of slowing growth; unemployment at 3.8% remains low but is trending higher, indicating a cooling labor market; inflation at 2.7% still exceeds the Fed's 2.0% target, limiting the pace of rate cuts; and interest rates at 4.3% remain elevated, keeping pressure on growth stock valuations. The dividend stock investment strategy for the late-cycle phase calls for increasing SCHD to a 20–25% weighting to defend against slowdown risk, adding defensive sector ETFs (XLP, XLU, XLV) to raise total defensive assets to 40%, and trimming QQQ from 50% to 40% to manage valuation risk. On timing for buying dividend stocks: when prices correct by -10% or more, use SCHD pullbacks to add at a lower average cost—investors who bought SCHD when it fell from $75 to $70 during the 2022 bear market saw a +14% gain as it recovered to $80 by 2025. When the dividend yield exceeds 4%, treat it as a signal of undervaluation—historically, a yield above 4% has marked buying opportunities (as a rising yield reflects a lower price), while the current 3.5% yield represents a neutral level. When recession signals appear (unemployment rising by +0.5 percentage points, PMI below 48, or negative GDP growth), raise SCHD's weighting to 30%, as economic downturns are the phase where dividend stocks' defensive qualities shine brightest. On timing for selling dividend stocks: in the early expansion phase (not the current situation), growth stocks significantly outperform dividend stocks, so trim SCHD to 15% and increase QQQ as a low-rate environment reduces dividend appeal and opens opportunities to capture high-growth returns. When the dividend yield falls below 2.5%, treat it as a signal of overvaluation (reflecting excessive price appreciation), take profits and reallocate to bonds or growth stocks—historically, a yield below 2.5% has marked selling opportunities. When valuations reach peaks (SCHD P/E above 20x, P/B above 3x), consider the position overvalued: realize some gains to manage risk, noting that the current SCHD P/E of 15x and P/B of 2.5x are at neutral levels. Sample portfolios by economic phase: for the current late-cycle phase, SCHD 25%, QQQ 35%, AGG 25%, XLP 15% balances defense with growth; in an anticipated recession, SCHD 30%, AGG 35%, XLP 20%, QQQ 15% prioritizes defense above all; in a future recovery, SCHD 15%, QQQ 50%, AGG 20%, SOXX 15% maximizes growth. Use the rebalancing calculator to adjust your SCHD target weighting by economic phase (15% expansion, 25% late-cycle, 30% recession) and check for allocation drift each quarter; use the asset allocation calculator to simulate the loss-protection effect in a recession and the return profile in an expansion for SCHD weightings of 15%, 25%, and 30%—then maintain the optimal dividend stock weighting consistent with your economic outlook and risk tolerance, adjusting dynamically as the cycle evolves.
Building and Rebalancing a Dividend Portfolio in Practice
A dividend-focused portfolio should be tailored to your age and income needs. By age group: investors in their 40s (growth-first) should allocate 20% to dividend ETFs (SCHD 15%, VYM 5%), 60% to growth ETFs (QQQ 50%, SOXX 10%), 15% to bonds (AGG 10%, TLT 5%), and hold 5% in cash—prioritizing growth while using dividends to add stability. Investors in their 50s (balanced) should allocate 35% to dividend ETFs (SCHD 25%, DGRO 10%), 40% to growth ETFs (QQQ 35%, SOXX 5%), 20% to bonds (AGG 15%, IEF 5%), and hold 5% in cash—seeking a balance of dividends and growth. Investors in their 60s (stability-first) should allocate 50% to dividend ETFs (SCHD 35%, VYM 15%), 20% to growth ETFs (QQQ 20%), 25% to bonds (AGG 20%, IEF 5%), and hold 5% in cash—maximizing dividend income while still securing some growth. By income need: if you need annual living expenses of 50 million KRW, a 1.5 billion KRW dividend portfolio generating 1.5B × 3.5% (SCHD dividend yield) = 52.5 million KRW can cover those expenses; an SCHD-heavy allocation (60%) maximizes dividend income, and a +12% dividend growth rate outpaces inflation, preserving real purchasing power. If you need 30 million KRW per year, a 900 million KRW portfolio generating 900M × 3.5% = 31.5 million KRW covers those expenses; combining SCHD with a pension—15 million KRW pension + 31.5 million KRW in dividends = 46.5 million KRW—allows for a comfortable retirement, while reinvesting 50% of dividends continues to grow assets. If living expenses are fully covered and dividend income is not needed, reinvest 100% of dividends to maximize compounding, increase the DGRO weighting to push dividend growth to +15%, and hold for 10–20 years to double or triple assets for inheritance or gifting to children. For rebalancing strategy, the quarterly review approach calls for rebalancing whenever a dividend ETF's weighting deviates by more than ±5 percentage points from its target at quarter-end: for example, if SCHD's 25% target rises to 30% due to dividend reinvestment, sell 5 percentage points' worth and redistribute to QQQ; if dividend income is needed, rather than selling, simply raise the target weighting to 30%. The dividend-yield-based approach calls for increasing the SCHD weighting by +5 percentage points when its dividend yield exceeds 4% (a signal of undervaluation), and reducing it by -5 percentage points when the yield falls below 2.5% (a signal of overvaluation), using the dividend yield as a valuation indicator for dynamic allocation. For deploying new capital, pre-retirement investors (50s and 60s) should direct new cash primarily to dividend ETFs; add to SCHD on sharp drawdowns (-10% or more) to lower the average cost; and leverage a +12% dividend growth rate to maximize long-term compounding. A practical rebalancing example: starting with a 200 million KRW portfolio (SCHD 50M/25%, QQQ 70M/35%, AGG 50M/25%, XLP 30M/15%), after one year of SCHD +11.5% (price +8%, dividends +3.5%), QQQ +20%, AGG -1%, and XLP +5%, the portfolio grows to 221.55 million KRW (SCHD 55.75M/25.2%, QQQ 84M/37.9%, AGG 49.5M/22.3%, XLP 31.5M/14.2%). SCHD's weighting rose only 0.2 percentage points from its 25% target—within the ±5pp band, so no rebalancing is needed; QQQ rose 2.9 percentage points from its 35% target—also within the band, so again no rebalancing is needed. After two years (SCHD cumulative +17%, QQQ +40%, AGG -2%, XLP +8%), the portfolio grows to 245.93 million KRW (SCHD 58.38M/23.7%, QQQ 98M/39.9%, AGG 49M/19.9%, XLP 32.4M/13.2%). SCHD's weighting fell 1.3 percentage points below its 25% target—still within the band; QQQ rose 4.9 percentage points above its 35% target—still just within the ±5pp band, so rebalancing is still not triggered. However, at the next quarterly review, if QQQ's weighting exceeds 40% (hitting the upper bound of the band), sell a portion of QQQ and redistribute to SCHD and AGG to restore balance. The benefits of rebalancing include locking in QQQ gains by selling near the high to manage valuation risk, restoring the SCHD weighting by buying near the low to maintain dividend income, managing portfolio volatility to its target level for psychological stability, and stabilizing long-term returns. Use the rebalancing calculator to set target dividend ETF weightings (e.g., SCHD 25%, VYM 10%) and check for drift each quarter; use the asset allocation calculator to simulate dividend income and total returns for dividend ETF allocations of 25%, 35%, and 50%—then build the optimal dividend portfolio for your age, income needs, and risk tolerance, and rebalance regularly to achieve both dividend income and asset growth simultaneously.
Conclusion
Dividend growth stocks are the optimal investment strategy for simultaneously delivering stable income and capital appreciation amid market volatility. SCHD selects only financially sound, proven companies, resulting in superior dividend sustainability and an annual dividend growth rate of +12% that maximizes the power of compounding. Use the rebalancing calculator to adjust your dividend ETF allocation according to the economic cycle, and the asset allocation calculator to simulate a dividend reinvestment strategy—allowing you to build the optimal dividend portfolio suited to your age and income needs. Reinvesting dividends to harness compounding and achieve long-term wealth accumulation is the cornerstone of retirement planning.
Related Portfolios
#[KO] 리밸런싱 계산기#[KO] 자산배분 계산기#SCHD#Dividend Growth#[KO] 인컴 투자
Related Articles
Have any questions?