ETF 리밸런싱 계산기

미국 주식, 국내 주식, ETF를 한 곳에서 관리하고 목표 비중에 맞게 자동 리밸런싱

미국 주식·국내 주식 실시간 시세
자동 매수/매도 계산
클라우드 동기화 지원
Monetary Policy2025-09-28

Long-Term Bond ETFs Surge on Fed Rate Cut Signals: Revisiting TLT vs IEF Duration Strategy

Long-term Treasury bond ETFs surged after the Fed signaled additional rate cuts. Now is a good time to reassess bond ETF selection by duration and revisit your rebalancing strategy.

관리자Naver

Long-term Treasury bond ETFs posted substantial gains following fresh signals from the Federal Reserve of additional rate cuts. As the performance gap between TLT—which invests in Treasuries with maturities of 20 years or more—and IEF—focused on the 7–10 year range—has widened, investor interest in duration strategy is rising. This is a moment that calls for a clear understanding of how bond ETF sensitivity shifts with interest rate changes, and for a systematic approach using an asset allocation calculator.

Duration Sensitivity: TLT vs IEF Compared

TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) has an average duration of roughly 17–18 years, meaning a 1% decline in interest rates could translate into a price gain of approximately 17–18%. IEF (iShares 7–10 Year Treasury Bond ETF), by contrast, carries a duration of about 8 years, making it considerably less sensitive to rate moves. In the current rate-cutting environment, TLT can deliver larger gains—but it also carries a greater risk of loss if rates rise. Selecting the right duration based on your risk tolerance and investment horizon is critical, and using a rebalancing calculator to fine-tune portfolio weightings is highly advisable.

Comparative Advantages Over AGG ETF

AGG (iShares Core U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) blends bonds across a wide range of maturities, resulting in an average duration of around 6–7 years and a generally stable profile. For investors who are uncertain about the direction of rates or who prefer a steadier bond allocation, AGG is a solid fit. However, when the rate-cut trajectory is as clear as it is today, pure Treasury-focused ETFs like TLT or IEF tend to outperform. When using an asset allocation calculator, one approach worth considering is treating AGG as a core fixed-income position while deploying TLT or IEF as a tactical overlay.

Optimal Strategy Across Interest Rate Scenarios

If rate cuts continue, TLT's relative outperformance is likely to persist—but should inflation re-accelerate or economic strength limit the scope of further cuts, IEF or AGG may prove the safer choice. Staying on top of the Fed's terminal rate projections and incoming economic data, and adjusting the portfolio accordingly, will be essential. Rebalancing on a quarterly schedule allows you to respond to market shifts without overreacting to short-term volatility. Maintaining bond ETF exposure at roughly 20–40% of the total portfolio and managing interest rate risk through duration adjustments is an effective long-term approach.

A Practical Rebalancing Guide

At this juncture, a bond portfolio structured as roughly TLT 30%, IEF 40%, and AGG 30% is worth considering—a balanced approach that pursues both rate-cut upside and stability. Using a rebalancing calculator, set a rule to rebalance whenever any ETF drifts more than ±10% from its target weight. When new capital is added, prioritize buying whichever ETF has fallen below its target weighting to achieve a natural rebalancing effect. For tax-conscious investors, selling ETFs sitting at a loss first while holding onto those with gains for the long term is also a strategy worth exploring.

결론

When investing in bond ETFs amid shifting interest rates, duration strategy is the cornerstone. Whether you choose TLT or IEF, factor in your investment horizon and risk tolerance—and use an asset allocation calculator alongside a rebalancing calculator for a disciplined, systematic approach.

#rebalancing calculator#asset allocation calculator#TLT vs IEF#AGG ETF#duration strategy#interest rate risk#bond investing

궁금한 점이 있으신가요?