Investment Strategy2025-11-03
Dividend Aristocrats Back in Focus: SCHD and VYM High-Yield ETFs Gain Attention
High-dividend ETFs are drawing renewed investor interest amid the rate-cutting cycle, offering stable income alongside price appreciation. SCHD rose +2.8% on the week with a 3.6% dividend yield, while VYM gained +2.4% with a 3.1% yield — both delivering dividend growth and capital gains simultaneously. Optimizing dividend allocation through an asset allocation calculator is increasingly important in this environment.
AdminCNBC
High-dividend ETFs are attracting significant investor attention in November 2025 as the Fed's rate-cutting cycle gains momentum. As deposit rates fall toward the 4% range, investors are rotating into dividend stocks in search of higher yields. SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) posted a 3.6% dividend yield alongside a weekly gain of +2.8%, bringing its year-to-date return to +16%. VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) rose +2.4% with a 3.1% yield, while DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) gained +2.1% with a 2.5% yield — all delivering both income and capital appreciation. NOBL, which tracks S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats (companies with 25+ consecutive years of dividend increases), also rose +2.6%, affirming its long-term dividend reliability. High-dividend stocks are particularly popular among investors in their 50s and 60s preparing for retirement, as their defensive characteristics help cushion losses during market volatility. Investors should use a rebalancing calculator to check whether their dividend stock allocation has drifted from target, and an asset allocation calculator to identify the optimal mix of SCHD, VYM, and DGRO for their income needs and risk tolerance.
Why Rate Cuts Make Dividend Stocks More Attractive
The primary reason dividend stocks gain appeal during rate-cutting cycles is their relative yield advantage. As deposit rates fell from 4.5% to 4.0%, the gap with SCHD's 3.6% dividend yield narrowed — and SCHD's annual dividend growth of +8% means its long-term real return surpasses deposits, especially when factoring in price appreciation. Over 2020–2025, SCHD's total return (dividends + price) averaged +12% per year, more than tripling the return on bank deposits (+3%). Meanwhile, as Treasury yields fell to 3.8%, the gap with SCHD's 3.6% yield became negligible — but SCHD offers dividend growth and capital appreciation on top, while Treasuries rely solely on price gains from falling rates. Dividend stocks benefit from improving fundamentals and rising payouts as an additional source of return. From a defensive standpoint, SCHD's holdings are dominated by consumer staples and healthcare names like Coca-Cola, P&G, and Johnson & Johnson — sectors with stable revenue even during recessions. During the 2022 bear market, SCHD fell only -8% compared to -18% for the S&P 500, and its volatility is 20–30% lower than the broader index, providing psychological reassurance for investors. For retirement-focused investors in their 50s and 60s, dividends can fund living expenses while preserving principal. A ₩100M investment in SCHD generates roughly ₩3.6M annually (about ₩300K/month) in dividend income, with dividend growth hedging against inflation and reinvestment compounding wealth over time. The rate-cut transmission mechanism works through multiple channels: lower rates reduce corporate interest expenses, boosting profits and dividend capacity; lower discount rates increase the intrinsic value of dividend stocks; and capital fleeing deposits and Treasuries flows into high-yield equities, pushing prices higher. During the last rate-cutting cycle from 2019 to 2021, SCHD gained an average of +15% per year, nearly matching the S&P 500's +18%. Investors can use a rebalancing calculator to set a target dividend weight (e.g., 20%) and trim the position if SCHD's price appreciation pushes it above 25%, realizing gains in the process.
SCHD: A Dividend Growth Strategy
SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) invests in 100 high-quality U.S. dividend-paying stocks with at least 10 consecutive years of dividend payments. Its selection criteria require a decade of uninterrupted dividends to ensure income stability, combined with screening for financial health metrics such as ROE, cash flow, and payout ratios. The fund limits its universe to companies with market caps above $500M, ensuring liquidity and quality. Top holdings include Texas Instruments (semiconductors, 4.3%), Coca-Cola (beverages, 4.1%), PepsiCo (food, 4.0%), Merck (pharmaceuticals, 3.8%), and Home Depot (retail, 3.7%), with a sector tilt toward consumer staples, healthcare, and industrials. Sector weights include financials at 18%, consumer staples at 15%, healthcare at 14%, industrials at 13%, and energy at 10%. Technology represents only 8% of the portfolio, making it more defensive than Nasdaq-heavy funds. SCHD's dividend yield of 3.6% is 2.8x that of the S&P 500 (1.3%), with an annual dividend growth rate of +8% that significantly outpaces inflation (+3%), steadily growing real income over time. The expense ratio is a rock-bottom 0.06%. Year-to-date through 2025, SCHD gained +16%, lagging the S&P 500 (+22%) on price alone — but including its 3.6% dividend, total return reaches +19.6%, narrowing the gap considerably. The core advantage of SCHD is its dividend growth: at +8% annually, the effective yield on cost doubles to roughly 7.8% over 10 years through compounding, generating enough income to cover living expenses in retirement. Reinvested dividends compound to more than 10x the original investment over 30 years. SCHD also offers defensive characteristics, with 20% lower volatility than the S&P 500 and roughly half the drawdown during the 2022 bear market. For income-focused investors, a ₩100M allocation produces ₩300K/month in dividends today, rising to approximately ₩400K/month in five years and ₩650K/month in ten years as dividends grow. On the risk side, SCHD tends to underperform during growth-led bull markets — SCHD returned +70% over 2020–2025 versus +120% for QQQ — and can face valuation headwinds when interest rates rise. Its lower exposure to technology (8%) limits participation in structural growth themes like AI and cloud computing, while financials and consumer staples together representing 33% of the portfolio create concentration risk in those sectors. In practice, SCHD works well as a 20–30% core dividend allocation in a diversified portfolio. Retirement-focused investors (50s–60s) may push it to 30–40% to maximize income, while younger growth-oriented investors (30s–40s) might limit it to 10–20% to balance income and growth. Dividend reinvestment amplifies compounding, and pairing SCHD with QQQ (e.g., 50/50) balances income and growth exposure. Opportunistic buying on dips of -10% or more increases the effective yield. A rebalancing calculator can help set and monitor SCHD's target weight on a quarterly basis, while an asset allocation calculator can simulate total return and dividend income across SCHD weightings of 20%, 30%, and 40% to identify the right allocation for each investor's income and growth objectives.
VYM vs. SCHD: Comparing High-Dividend ETFs
VYM (Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF) is similar to SCHD but differs meaningfully in breadth and yield characteristics. VYM holds 442 U.S. high-dividend stocks — more than four times the number in SCHD — providing broader diversification at the cost of a slightly lower yield. Top holdings include Broadcom (semiconductors, 3.8%), ExxonMobil (energy, 3.2%), JPMorgan (financials, 3.1%), Johnson & Johnson (healthcare, 2.9%), and P&G (consumer staples, 2.8%), skewed toward mega-cap names. Sector weights are similar to SCHD — financials at 21%, healthcare at 14%, consumer staples at 13%, energy at 11%, industrials at 10% — though VYM carries slightly more energy exposure. VYM's dividend yield of 3.1% is below SCHD's 3.6%, but still 2.4x that of the S&P 500 (1.3%). Its annual dividend growth rate of +6% is lower than SCHD's +8% but remains steady. Both funds share the same 0.06% expense ratio. Year-to-date through 2025, VYM gained +14%, slightly trailing SCHD's +16%. Head-to-head, SCHD leads on yield (3.6% vs. 3.1%) and dividend growth (+8% vs. +6%), making it the stronger choice for income-focused investors. VYM has the edge in diversification with 442 holdings versus SCHD's 100, reducing single-stock risk. Over 2020–2025, SCHD's total return of +70% outpaced VYM's +62%, reflecting stronger performance on both yield and price. VYM's higher energy weighting (11% vs. 10%) makes it slightly more sensitive to oil price swings, while SCHD's heavier industrials and consumer staples exposure gives it more cyclical recovery leverage. VYM's mega-cap tilt provides stability, while SCHD's inclusion of mid-cap names adds growth potential. The bottom line: income maximizers should favor SCHD for its superior yield and dividend growth; those prioritizing maximum diversification should choose VYM for its 442-stock breadth and lower single-stock risk; those seeking energy sector exposure will find VYM a better fit. A blended approach — SCHD 60% + VYM 40% — balances yield and diversification, using SCHD as the core income engine and VYM as a diversification complement. Quarterly rebalancing using a rebalancing calculator keeps each position at its target weight, while an asset allocation calculator can model long-term dividend income and total returns across SCHD-only, VYM-only, and blended scenarios.
DGRO and NOBL: Dividend Growth Strategies
DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) invests in 414 stocks with at least five consecutive years of dividend growth, capturing companies earlier in their dividend-growth journey while maintaining meaningful growth potential. Its selection criteria are less stringent than SCHD's (5 years vs. 10 years of dividend history), but it screens comprehensively for dividend growth rate, financial health, and profitability to identify companies with strong future payout growth prospects. The fund includes companies with market caps above $300M, reaching into mid-cap territory for additional growth exposure. Top holdings include Apple (7.2%), Microsoft (6.8%), Johnson & Johnson (3.1%), ExxonMobil (2.9%), and Visa (2.5%) — notably including mega-cap tech names absent from SCHD. Sector weights reflect this technology tilt: technology at 28%, financials at 16%, healthcare at 13%, industrials at 12%, and consumer staples at 11%. Technology represents 28% of the portfolio, 3.5x SCHD's 8% allocation. DGRO's dividend yield of 2.5% is lower than SCHD's 3.6%, but its annual dividend growth rate of +10% exceeds SCHD's +8%, meaning long-term payouts escalate faster. The expense ratio of 0.08% remains very competitive. Year-to-date through 2025, DGRO gained +18%, slightly outperforming SCHD's +16%, with technology exposure contributing to the outperformance. NOBL (ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) takes the most stringent approach, investing in 67 S&P 500 companies with at least 25 consecutive years of dividend increases. These Dividend Aristocrats — including Coca-Cola, P&G, 3M, and Walmart — have maintained or grown their dividends through recessions, financial crises, and market downturns, making NOBL the highest-conviction quality dividend fund available. Top holdings include Walmart (retail, 3.8%), Emerson Electric (industrials, 3.5%), Target (retail, 3.3%), Ecolab (industrials, 3.2%), and IBM (technology, 3.1%), with a tilt toward retail and industrials. NOBL's dividend yield is 2.4% — below SCHD's 3.6% — but dividend stability is unmatched. Its annual dividend growth of +7% is solid, and the 0.35% expense ratio, while higher than SCHD's 0.06%, is justifiable given the rigorous Dividend Aristocrat selection process. Year-to-date through 2025, NOBL gained +15%, lagging the S&P 500's +22% — but it fell only -5% in the 2022 bear market versus -18% for the S&P 500, demonstrating its superior downside protection. Comparing DGRO and SCHD: SCHD wins on current yield (3.6% vs. 2.5%), making it better for immediate income needs; DGRO wins on dividend growth (+10% vs. +8%), meaning its income overtakes SCHD's faster over the long run. Over 2020–2025, DGRO returned +75% versus SCHD's +70%, with technology exposure providing a modest lift. NOBL stands apart as the ultimate quality screen — 25+ years of uninterrupted dividend growth through every market cycle — and offers the strongest bear market defense, but trails SCHD and DGRO in long-term total return, making it best suited for stability-first investors. In practice, income-focused investors can rely on SCHD alone for 3.6% yield and +8% dividend growth; growth-oriented investors can use DGRO alone for +10% dividend growth and 28% technology exposure; stability-first investors can hold NOBL for the unmatched reliability of 25-year-plus Dividend Aristocrats. Blended strategies offer the best of multiple objectives: SCHD 50% + DGRO 30% + NOBL 20% balances yield, growth, and stability; SCHD 70% + DGRO 30% balances income and growth; SCHD 80% + NOBL 20% prioritizes income with a quality stability overlay. A rebalancing calculator helps monitor target weights for each position quarterly, while an asset allocation calculator can run comprehensive simulations across SCHD, DGRO, NOBL, and blended portfolios — modeling dividend income, growth rates, and downside risk to identify the optimal strategy for each investor's priorities.
Building and Rebalancing a Dividend Portfolio
A dividend portfolio should be tailored to an investor's age and income requirements. As a general framework: investors in their 40s (growth-focused) might allocate 15% to dividend ETFs — SCHD 10% + DGRO 5% — balancing income and growth; investors in their 50s (balanced) might allocate 25% — SCHD 15%, VYM 7%, DGRO 3% — to expand dividend income; and investors in their 60s (income-focused) might allocate 40% — SCHD 25%, VYM 10%, NOBL 5% — to maximize stable dividend cash flow. For balancing dividends with growth: a SCHD 30% + QQQ 40% + bonds 30% mix addresses all market environments with income, growth, and stability; a SCHD 40% + SPY 40% + bonds 20% mix pursues stable growth while tracking broad market returns; and a SCHD 50% + VYM 30% + bonds 20% mix maximizes dividend income and suits retirement asset management. On dividend reinvestment: younger investors (30s–40s) should reinvest 100% of dividends to maximize compounding — historical data shows this can grow the initial investment by more than 10x over 30 years; pre-retirees (50s) might reinvest 50% and hold 50% in cash, balancing income and growth; retirees (60s and older) can direct 100% of dividends toward living expenses, preserving principal while living off dividend income. Rebalancing discipline matters: a quarterly check triggers rebalancing when a position drifts ±5 percentage points from its target. For example, if SCHD's target weight is 25% and price appreciation pushes it to 30%, selling the 5pp excess and reallocating to growth stocks or bonds captures gains and restores balance. A yield-based trigger can supplement this: trim SCHD if its yield falls below 2.5% (price has run up significantly) and add to SCHD if its yield rises above 4.5% (price has fallen sharply). New cash inflows can be directed primarily to dividend ETFs to expand the income base, and sharp drawdowns of -10% or more in SCHD represent opportunistic buying opportunities — historically, a SCHD yield above 4% has coincided with attractive entry points. A worked example: starting with a ₩100M portfolio (SCHD ₩25M / 25%, QQQ ₩40M / 40%, bonds ₩30M / 30%, cash ₩5M / 5%), after six months with SCHD +10%, QQQ +20%, and bonds +3%, the portfolio grows to approximately ₩114.9M — with SCHD at 23.9%, QQQ at 41.8%, bonds at 26.9%, and cash at 4.4%. QQQ's drift from 40% to 41.8% is within the ±5pp band, so no rebalancing is required. After twelve months with SCHD +18%, QQQ +35%, and bonds +5%, the portfolio grows to approximately ₩126.1M — with SCHD at 23.4%, QQQ at 42.8%, bonds at 25.0%, and cash at 4.0%. QQQ is now 2.8pp above target, still within the band, though the cumulative drift suggests rebalancing may be warranted at the next quarterly review. SCHD dividends for the year (approximately ₩4.2M, reflecting one year of +18% appreciation on ₩3.6M base) are reinvested into SCHD to compound wealth. A rebalancing calculator can track total dividend allocation (e.g., 25%) and sub-allocations (SCHD 15%, VYM 7%, DGRO 3%), flagging drift on a quarterly basis, while an asset allocation calculator can simulate 30-year wealth accumulation under dividend reinvestment versus dividend withdrawal scenarios to identify the optimal strategy.
Conclusion
In a rate-cutting environment, high-dividend ETFs offer the dual benefit of stable income and capital appreciation. SCHD provides a core dividend allocation with a 3.6% yield and +8% annual dividend growth; VYM adds diversification across 442 holdings to enhance portfolio stability; and DGRO pursues long-term growth through +10% dividend growth and meaningful technology exposure. Use a rebalancing calculator to keep dividend stock weights aligned with your targets, and an asset allocation calculator to simulate the dividend income and total returns of various SCHD, VYM, and DGRO combinations — so you can build the optimal dividend portfolio for your income needs and risk tolerance.
Related Portfolios
#[KO] 리밸런싱 계산기#[KO] 자산배분 계산기#SCHD#Dividend Growth#[KO] 인컴 투자
Related Articles
Have any questions?