Market Analysis2025-10-31
Reducing U.S. Stock Concentration: Global Diversification Strategy with VXUS and EEM
U.S. stock concentration has reached historical highs, bringing renewed attention to global diversification. VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) rose +2.8% on its valuation appeal, while EEM (Emerging Markets ETF) surged +4.2% on expectations of China's stimulus package. Investors should strengthen geographic diversification through asset allocation and rebalancing.
AdminCNBC
As of October 2025, U.S. stocks account for 63% of global market capitalization — the highest level since the late-1990s dot-com bubble. The S&P 500's P/E ratio of 23x represents a 60–90% premium over developed international markets (MSCI EAFE at 14x P/E) and emerging markets (MSCI EM at 12x P/E). Against this backdrop, the case for global diversification has grown increasingly compelling: VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) gained +2.8% for the week, and EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) surged +4.2% following China's announcement of new stimulus measures. History shows that during periods of U.S. stock overvaluation, international equities have frequently outperformed the U.S. over the following decade — the 2000–2010 period being a prime example, with U.S. equities returning -9% versus emerging markets at +154%. Given today's environment, investors should consider capping U.S. equity exposure at 60–70%, adding VXUS at 20–30% and EEM at 5–10% to enhance geographic diversification. Use a rebalancing calculator to monitor regional allocations quarterly, and a portfolio simulator to model long-term returns and volatility across different U.S.-vs.-international scenarios.
U.S. Concentration Risk and the Case for Global Diversification
U.S. stock concentration has reached historical extremes, raising the risk of a significant correction. The U.S. currently represents 63% of global market capitalization — close to the 1999 dot-com peak of 65%. After Japan's bubble burst in the 1990s, the U.S. share fell to 30%, only to rise again during the 2010s tech boom. High concentration means that any U.S. equity correction could deal a severe blow to the entire portfolio.
From a valuation standpoint, the S&P 500's P/E of 23x stands 60–90% above European equities (MSCI Europe at 13x), Japan (MSCI Japan at 15x), and emerging markets (MSCI EM at 12x). The gap widens even further when measured by the Shiller CAPE: U.S. at 32x, developed international at 18x, and emerging markets at 14x. Historically, overvalued assets tend to deliver lower future returns, while undervalued assets revert to the mean with stronger performance.
Historical precedents make this case clearly. In 2000–2010, following the dot-com bust, the U.S. returned -9% while emerging markets returned +154%. In the 1980–1990 period during Japan's bubble, Japanese equities significantly outperformed U.S. stocks. By the law of mean reversion, today's U.S. overvaluation may represent an optimal entry point for international equities.
In terms of diversification benefit, a U.S.-only portfolio (VTI 100%) returned -0.9% annually during 2000–2010, while a globally diversified portfolio (VTI 60% / VXUS 40%) returned +2.8% — outperforming by 3.7 percentage points per year. International equities provide a cushion when U.S. stocks decline, and a weaker dollar further boosts overseas returns.
The currently recommended geographic allocation is: U.S. (VTI, SPY) at 60–70% as the core holding — avoiding excessive concentration above 80–90%; developed international (VXUS) at 20–30% for exposure to Europe, Japan, and Canada; and emerging markets (EEM) at 5–10% for higher-growth markets such as China, India, and Taiwan. Use a rebalancing calculator to monitor U.S. vs. international allocations, reallocating excess U.S. weight above 70% into VXUS and EEM. A portfolio simulator comparing U.S.-only (100%) versus global (60% U.S. / 40% international) over a 10-year horizon can quantify the diversification benefit.
VXUS: Developed International Exposure and Opportunities in Europe and Japan
VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) provides diversified exposure to 8,293 companies across developed and emerging markets outside the United States. Top holdings include Nestlé (Switzerland, food), Samsung Electronics (South Korea, semiconductors), ASML (Netherlands, semiconductors), Tencent (China, internet), and Novo Nordisk (Denmark, pharmaceuticals) — offering strong sector and country diversification. Geographically, Europe accounts for 40%, Asia-Pacific (including Japan) for 35%, and emerging markets for 25%. VXUS trades at an average P/E of 14x, a 40% discount to the U.S. (23x), and offers a dividend yield of 2.8% — more than double the U.S. average of 1.3% — making it particularly attractive for income-oriented investors. With an expense ratio of just 0.08%, VXUS is extremely cost-efficient. Year-to-date in 2025, VXUS has gained +12%, trailing the U.S. (VTI +22%), but its valuation advantage suggests a strong likelihood of outperforming over the next decade.
Europe presents a compelling opportunity. MSCI Europe's P/E of 13x represents a 43% discount to the U.S. The European Central Bank's (ECB) rate cuts have raised expectations for a eurozone recovery, and the region is home to globally competitive companies in luxury goods (LVMH), semiconductors (ASML), and energy (Shell, TotalEnergies).
Japan is similarly attractive. MSCI Japan's P/E of 15x is 35% below the U.S. A weaker yen benefits Japanese exporters as the Bank of Japan (BOJ) normalizes policy. Top-quality companies like Toyota, Sony, and Mitsubishi offer stable dividend yields of 2–3%, and ongoing improvements in corporate governance — including expanded buybacks and rising dividends — continue to unlock shareholder value.
For VXUS strategy: allocate 20–30% of the portfolio to achieve broad global diversification. When U.S. equities surge and VXUS's allocation drifts below target, rebalance to buy the dip. Reinvest dividends to maximize compounding. Use a rebalancing calculator to set a target VXUS weight (e.g., 25%) and rebalance quarterly when it drifts off target. A portfolio simulator comparing VXUS allocations of 20% vs. 30% vs. 40% can help identify the optimal international equity weight.
EEM: Emerging Market Exposure and Growth Opportunities in China and India
EEM (iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) invests in 1,275 companies across emerging economies including China, India, Taiwan, and Brazil. Top holdings include TSMC (Taiwan, semiconductors), Tencent (China, internet), Samsung Electronics (South Korea, semiconductors), Alibaba (China, e-commerce), and Infosys (India, IT services) — with a concentration in technology and consumer sectors. By country: China 30%, India 20%, Taiwan 18%, South Korea 12%, Brazil 5%. The average P/E of 12x represents a 48% discount to the U.S. (23x), and GDP growth of 5–7% annually is more than double the U.S. rate of 2–3%, offering strong long-term growth potential. The expense ratio of 0.68% is higher than VXUS (0.08%), but this is a reasonable cost for accessing high-growth markets. Year-to-date in 2025, EEM has gained +18%, slightly trailing VTI (+22%), but China's stimulus measures and India's growth momentum provide additional upside potential.
China offers a significant near-term catalyst. The Chinese government announced a 1 trillion yuan ($140 billion) stimulus package targeting infrastructure investment and consumer spending. Housing market stabilization measures — including mortgage rate cuts — are improving consumer confidence, and regulatory easing for tech giants like Alibaba and Tencent is raising earnings expectations. Chinese A-shares trade at around 10x P/E, near historical lows, presenting a buying opportunity.
India remains the standout long-term growth story. India's GDP growth of +7% is the highest among major economies. Prime Minister Modi's Make in India manufacturing initiative is accelerating foreign investment inflows. The expanding middle class — growing by approximately 20 million people annually — is driving strong growth in consumer and financial sectors. Meanwhile, IT services firms like Infosys and TCS are posting strong results on surging AI and cloud demand. India's Sensex trades at a P/E of 22x, comparable to the U.S. (23x), but with more than double the growth rate — making it undervalued on a PEG basis.
For EEM strategy: allocate 5–10% of the portfolio to capture emerging market growth, while maintaining disciplined risk management given volatility that runs approximately 1.5x that of the U.S. Leverage EEM's diversification across India, Taiwan, and South Korea to partially offset China-specific risks (political and regulatory). Use sharp drawdowns in EEM (more than -10%) as opportunities to add. Set a target EEM weight (e.g., 7%) in a rebalancing calculator and rebalance quarterly. A portfolio simulator comparing EEM allocations of 5% vs. 10% vs. 15% can help calibrate the right emerging market exposure for your risk tolerance.
Currency Effects and Currency Hedging Strategy
When investing in international equities, currency fluctuations can have a significant impact on returns. When the U.S. dollar weakens, overseas returns are amplified: for example, if VXUS rises +10% in local currency terms and the dollar falls -5% against the euro and yen, the dollar-denominated VXUS return rises to approximately +15.5% (due to compounding). Conversely, a stronger dollar reduces international returns: if VXUS rises +10% in local terms but the dollar strengthens +5%, the dollar-denominated return falls to only +4.5%.
Currency-hedged ETFs eliminate exchange rate fluctuations and track pure equity performance. HEDJ (WisdomTree Europe Hedged Equity ETF) invests in European equities while hedging the euro/dollar exchange rate, protecting returns even in a rising-dollar environment. However, hedging comes at a cost (typically 0.5–1% per year), and currency-hedged ETFs forgo the additional gains from a weaker dollar.
The choice between hedged and unhedged depends on your currency outlook. If you expect dollar strength, a hedged ETF (HEDJ) can protect against currency losses. If you expect dollar weakness, an unhedged ETF (VXUS, EEM) captures additional currency gains. For long-term investors, unhedged ETFs are generally preferable, as currencies tend to mean-revert over time, making the hedging cost difficult to justify.
Historical comparison (2015–2025): unhedged VXUS returned an annualized +6.8%, benefiting from currency tailwinds during the dollar-weak period of 2017–2021. A hedged European ETF returned +5.2% annually — underperforming due to hedging costs — but successfully limited losses during the dollar-strong period of 2022–2023. Long-term investors favor the unhedged approach (VXUS, EEM) on both cost and return grounds.
For currency risk management: maintain 60–70% of the portfolio in dollar-denominated assets (U.S. equities and bonds) to dampen currency swings. The international equity allocation (VXUS, EEM) at 30–40% naturally hedges against dollar weakness. The balance between dollar and non-dollar assets organically diversifies currency risk. Use a rebalancing calculator to review the real returns of international equities after currency adjustments, and a portfolio simulator to model hedged vs. unhedged scenarios over the long term.
Building a Globally Diversified Portfolio and Rebalancing Principles
A globally diversified portfolio simultaneously diversifies across regions, sectors, and currencies to minimize risk. Recommended allocations by investor profile: an aggressive portfolio (40s) of 60% U.S. (VTI, QQQ), 25% VXUS, 10% EEM, 5% bonds (AGG) focused on growth; a balanced portfolio (50s) of 50% U.S., 25% VXUS, 5% EEM, 20% bonds for a blend of growth and stability; and a conservative portfolio (60s) of 40% U.S., 20% VXUS, 35% bonds, 5% cash, prioritizing stability and excluding EEM to reduce volatility.
Rebalancing principles: using quarterly threshold-based rebalancing, review regional allocations at quarter-end and rebalance when any region deviates by more than ±5 percentage points from its target. For example, if U.S. equities surge from a 60% target to 70%, sell the excess 10% and reallocate to VXUS and EEM. Using a band-based approach, maintain each region's allocation within a ±10% band around its target (e.g., U.S. at 60% → acceptable range of 54–66%) and rebalance immediately upon a band breach.
New cash deployment: when new funds are available, buy into underweighted regions (VXUS, EEM) first to restore target weights without incurring trading costs on the core position. Drawdown response: if a region falls more than -10% in a single week, consider adding to capture the dip.
A practical rebalancing example: starting with a 100 million KRW portfolio (VTI 60M at 60%, VXUS 25M at 25%, EEM 5M at 5%, AGG 10M at 10%), after six months of VTI +15%, VXUS +5%, EEM +20%, the portfolio grows to 110.4M KRW (VTI 69M at 62.5%, VXUS 26.25M at 23.8%, EEM 6M at 5.4%, AGG 10M at 9.1%). VTI has drifted 2.5 percentage points above target, but remains within the ±5pp band — no rebalancing needed. After one year with VTI +30%, VXUS +8%, EEM +15%, the portfolio reaches 121.35M KRW (VTI 78M at 64.3%, VXUS 27M at 22.3%, EEM 5.75M at 4.7%, AGG 10M at 8.2%). VTI has drifted 4.3 percentage points above target — still within the ±5pp band — but the cumulative drift is increasing, making rebalancing likely at the next quarterly review.
Use a rebalancing calculator to set target regional weights (e.g., U.S. 60%, VXUS 25%, EEM 5%) and a ±5pp band, checking quarterly for drift. A portfolio simulator comparing rebalancing frequencies (quarterly vs. annually) can help identify the optimal rebalancing strategy for your situation.
Conclusion
During a period of elevated U.S. equity valuations, global diversification offers the dual benefit of risk mitigation and improved long-term returns. VXUS provides stable dividends and growth through exposure to undervalued developed markets, while EEM captures high-growth opportunities in emerging economies. A geographic allocation of U.S. at 60–70%, VXUS at 20–30%, and EEM at 5–10% meaningfully strengthens portfolio diversification. Use a rebalancing calculator to review regional weights on a quarterly basis, and a portfolio simulator to model long-term returns and volatility for a globally diversified portfolio — helping you arrive at the optimal global allocation for your individual needs.
Related Portfolios
#[KO] 리밸런싱 계산기#[KO] 자산배분 계산기#[KO] 글로벌 분산#[KO] 신흥시장#[KO] 국제 투자
Related Articles
Have any questions?