미국 ETF/주식IWMETF

iShares Russell 2000 ETF 계산기

IWM is an ETF profile used to attach reviewed context to calculator entry flows.

비중을 볼 때 확인할 점

  • Used to provide reviewed context in portfolio calculator entry flows.
  • Check exposure, costs, and overlap before using it in a portfolio.

리밸런싱 전 리스크

  • It can lose value depending on market conditions.
  • Costs, concentration, and tracking behavior should be reviewed before use.

계산기에서 확인하는 순서

  1. 1.iShares Russell 2000 ETF를 포트폴리오에 추가합니다.
  2. 2.보유 수량, 현금, 목표 비중을 입력합니다.
  3. 3.목표보다 과대·과소 편입인지 보고 매수·매도 필요 수량을 확인합니다.

비중 계산 기준

리밸런싱 계산기는 iShares Russell 2000 ETF의 현재 평가금액, 포트폴리오 현금, 다른 보유 종목의 평가금액을 함께 놓고 목표 비중과의 차이를 계산합니다. 실제 주문 수량은 현재가, 환율, 거래 수수료, 최소 주문 단위에 따라 달라질 수 있으므로 결과를 주문 전 점검용으로 사용하세요.

이 페이지를 쓰는 상황

신규 매수 전 목표 비중을 정하거나, iShares Russell 2000 ETF 비중이 커진 뒤 일부를 줄일지 확인할 때 유용합니다. 여러 종목을 함께 보유한다면 단일 수익률보다 전체 포트폴리오에서 차지하는 비중과 변동성 기여도를 먼저 확인하는 편이 안전합니다.

리밸런싱 계산기로 이동종목 비중 최적화

IWM vs VGT: Which ETF Is Better in 2026?

Compare IWM vs VGT by expense ratio, dividend yield, holdings, portfolio role, and rebalancing use case. See which ETF fits your 2026 portfolio.

Quick Verdict

IWM vs VGT at a glance

Open rebalancing calculator

Verdict

Depends on your goals

IWM and VGT each have different strengths, so the choice depends on your investment objectives. Choose the one with lower fees if cost is a priority, or the one with higher yield if income is your goal.

Lower fee

VGT

0.10%

Higher yield

IWM

1.2%

Broader holdings

IWM

1,990

Compare These ETFs in the Rebalancing Calculator

Add both ETFs, set target weights, and check how much to buy or sell to keep your portfolio aligned.

Open rebalancing calculatorOpen IWM calculatorOpen VGT calculatorView all ETF comparisons

Key Differences

  • 1Expense ratio: VGT 0.1% vs IWM 0.19% (VGT is 0.09%p cheaper)
  • 2Dividend yield: IWM 1.24% vs VGT 0.6%
  • 3Category: IWM is Small Cap, VGT is Sector ETFs
  • 4Holdings: IWM 1,990 vs VGT 316
  • 5Issuer: IWM (BlackRock(iShares)) vs VGT (Vanguard)

Conclusion

Recommended:Depends on your goals

IWM and VGT each have different strengths, so the choice depends on your investment objectives. Choose the one with lower fees if cost is a priority, or the one with higher yield if income is your goal.

Comparison Snapshot

Use the table below to compare cost, income, diversification, and portfolio role before making an allocation decision.

CategoryIWMVGT
Fund NameiShares Russell 2000 ETFVanguard Information Technology ETF
Current Price......
CategorySmall CapSector ETFs
Expense Ratio0.19%0.1%
Dividend Yield1.24%0.6%
Holdings1990316

IWM Top Holdings

  1. 1. Super Micro Computer
  2. 2. MicroStrategy
  3. 3. Comfort Systems

VGT Top Holdings

  1. 1. Apple
  2. 2. Microsoft
  3. 3. Nvidia
  4. 4. Visa

IWM Features

  • •Small-cap specialized
  • •Growth potential
  • •Tracks the Russell 2000
  • •High volatility

VGT Features

  • •Technology stock investing
  • •Growth stock focused
  • •Innovative companies
  • •Wide range of holdings

Pros & Cons

IWM

Advantages
  • ✓ Captures small-cap growth
  • ✓ Benefits from economic recovery
  • ✓ M&A premium
Disadvantages
  • ⚠ High volatility
  • ⚠ Liquidity risk
  • ⚠ Economically sensitive

VGT

Advantages
  • ✓ Technology sector concentration
  • ✓ More diverse holdings than XLK
  • ✓ Low expense ratio
Disadvantages
  • ⚠ Sector concentration risk
  • ⚠ High valuation
  • ⚠ Interest rate sensitive

Investment Strategy

Best For: IWM

Allocate 10-20% of total portfolio; adjust based on business cycle

Best For: VGT

Allocate 10-20% to tech sector; alternative to XLK

Detailed Analysis

1. 분석

IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) They belong to different categories — Small Cap and Sector ETFs — representing distinct investment areas. IWM: iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to small-capitalization companies. It carries an expense ratio of 0.19%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 1.24%. The portfolio holds 1990 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.19% and dividend yield of 1.24%, its top holdings include Super Micro Computer, MicroStrategy, Comfort Systems. Key features include Small-cap specialized, Growth potential, with Captures small-cap growth being a major advantage. VGT: Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to specific industry sectors. It carries an expense ratio of 0.10%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 0.60%. The portfolio holds 316 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.1% and dividend yield of 0.6%, top holdings include Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia. Notable features are Technology stock investing, Growth stock focused, with Technology sector concentration as a core strength. In terms of expense ratio, VGT is 0.09%p cheaper, which can lead to significant cost savings through compounding over long-term investment. Over 20 years with a $100,000 investment, this difference can amount to thousands of dollars.

2. 추천

IWM is suitable for Allocate 10-20% of total portfolio; adjust based on business cycle, while VGT is suitable for Allocate 10-20% to tech sector; alternative to XLK. Since they are in different categories, holding both can provide portfolio diversification benefits. Adjust the allocation based on your risk tolerance and investment horizon. For beginners, we recommend a core-satellite strategy: choose a low-cost, well-diversified ETF as your core holding, and allocate the rest to satellite positions.

3. 결론

Both IWM and VGT are excellent ETFs for their respective investment objectives. The key is to choose based on your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. Rather than focusing on a single metric (dividend yield, fees, etc.), evaluate from a holistic portfolio perspective. Use our rebalancing calculator to easily determine the optimal asset allocation including both ETFs.

IWM vs VGT Investment Guide

Both IWM and VGT are popular US ETFs, but they differ in investment strategy and portfolio role. IWM has an expense ratio of 0.19%, while VGT charges 0.1%, giving VGT a cost advantage. In terms of dividend yield, IWM offers 1.24% while VGT offers 0.6%, making IWM the better choice for income investors.

When choosing between the two, consider your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. If long-term growth is your priority, favor the ETF with lower fees and broader diversification. If you need steady cash flow, the higher-yielding ETF may be more suitable. You can also hold both in your portfolio for a complementary approach.

Regardless of which ETF you choose, maintaining your target allocation through regular rebalancing is key to long-term performance. Review your portfolio quarterly or semi-annually, and adjust if weights have drifted significantly. Our rebalancing calculator can automatically determine the buy/sell quantities for each holding.

5 Things to Check When Comparing ETFs

1.

Expense Ratio: Even a 0.1% difference in fees can translate to thousands of dollars over long-term investing. When two ETFs track a similar index, the lower-cost option has the edge.

2.

Tracking Index & Holdings: Even ETFs in the same category may track different indices. Review the top holdings and sector weights to find the best fit for your investment goals.

3.

Dividend Policy: Compare dividend frequency (monthly vs quarterly), yield, and dividend growth rate. Monthly dividend ETFs may be preferable if you need regular cash flow.

4.

Trading Volume & Liquidity: Sufficient daily trading volume ensures you can buy and sell at fair prices. Low-volume ETFs may have wider bid-ask spreads, increasing your trading costs.

5.

Portfolio Role: Determine whether the ETF serves as a core or satellite holding in your portfolio, and size your position accordingly.

Apply with the Rebalancing Calculator

Automatically calculate exactly how much to buy and sell to rebalance your portfolio.

Start Rebalancing Calculator

Related Content

IWM Detail Analysis
ETF Details
VGT Detail Analysis
ETF Details
ETF Selection Guide
Investment Guide