Manage US stocks, Korean stocks, and ETFs in one place and auto-rebalance to your target allocation
Real-time US & KR stock prices
Auto buy/sell calculation
Cloud sync supported
Investment Strategy2026-03-28
Wartime ETF Portfolio: Defensive Strategy Guide
With concerns of a prolonged US-Iran war, wartime portfolio construction strategies are gaining attention. Defensive asset allocation centered on gold, bonds, dividend stocks, and consumer staples ETFs is key to managing downside risk.
관리자
Despite Secretary Rubio's statement that the US-Iran war would conclude within weeks, markets are weighting the possibility of prolonged conflict. With the Dow and Nasdaq entering correction territory and VIX breaking 31, investors are focusing on wartime portfolio construction. Historically, defensive assets like gold, bonds, dividend stocks, and consumer staples have shown relatively better performance during geopolitical conflicts.
Core Wartime Portfolio: Four Defensive Asset Classes
The four proven defensive assets during geopolitical crises are gold, government bonds, high-dividend stocks, and consumer staples. Currently, gold (GLD) has risen 21% year-to-date, serving as the strongest safe haven. AGG ETF tracks the aggregate bond index for stable interest income. High-dividend ETFs like SCHD and VYM provide dividend income buffers even during price declines. XLP (Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR) invests in essential goods companies with strong defensive characteristics.
War Beneficiaries and Casualties by Sector
During wartime, energy (XLE) benefits from rising oil prices, while healthcare (VHT, XLV) maintains stable demand regardless of economic conditions. Conversely, tech stocks (XLK, QQQ) suffer in risk-off environments, with leveraged products like TQQQ experiencing rapid asset erosion in down markets. Real estate (VNQ, XLRE) faces dual pressure from rising rates and economic uncertainty. An asset allocation calculator helps verify the balance of each sector's weight.
Modified 60/40: Wartime Asset Allocation Model
The traditional 60/40 stock-bond portfolio can be adapted for wartime conditions. A suggested model includes equities 40% (SCHD 15%, VYM 10%, XLP 10%, XLE 5%), bonds 35% (AGG 20%, TLT 10%, TIP 5%), and alternatives 25% (GLD 20%, cash 5%). Using a rebalancing calculator to measure the gap between these target weights and current portfolio composition enables gradual, systematic adjustment.
Contrarian Opportunities for Long-Term Investors
Every crisis is also an opportunity. Dollar-cost averaging into quality assets during VIX 30+ fear environments has historically produced strong results. Gradually buying SPY or VOO with a long-term horizon while regularly adjusting weights through a rebalancing calculator represents the most balanced approach. DIA (SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF) and RSP (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight) also offer stable large-cap focused alternatives.
TLT vs IEF: Bond Duration Selection Criteria
In wartime bond investing, the TLT vs IEF choice depends on the expected conflict duration and rate outlook. If rate cuts are anticipated after a short conflict, TLT offers greater capital gains, but if inflation persists, IEF is safer. AGG ETF includes bonds across various maturities, naturally diversifying duration risk. An asset allocation calculator enables more precise risk management by examining the duration composition within the bond allocation.
Conclusion
Investing during wartime prioritizes risk management over return maximization. Building a defensive portfolio centered on GLD, AGG ETF, SCHD, and XLP while continuously managing weights through a rebalancing calculator is essential. Use an asset allocation calculator to simulate wartime model portfolios and gradually transition the current portfolio. Crises always end, and only prepared investors can harvest returns during the recovery.
