Manage US stocks, Korean stocks, and ETFs in one place and auto-rebalance to your target allocation
Real-time US & KR stock prices
Auto buy/sell calculation
Cloud sync supported
Market Analysis2025-10-31
Big Tech Earnings Season Wraps Up: QQQ vs. Sector ETF Rotation Strategy
Mixed Q3 results from Apple, Microsoft, and Google left QQQ with a modest +1.2% weekly gain. Semiconductors (SOXX) surged +4.5% on expanding AI infrastructure investment, while healthcare (XLV) held firm on defensive demand. Investors should maximize returns through sector rotation strategies and disciplined rebalancing.
AdminCNBC
As Big Tech Q3 earnings wrapped up in October 2025, markets responded with a mixed reaction. Apple missed revenue expectations due to sluggish iPhone 16 sales, Microsoft held its ground despite slowing cloud growth thanks to a surge in AI revenue, and Google beat expectations driven by an ad revenue recovery and expanded AI services. QQQ (Nasdaq 100 ETF) edged up just +1.2% for the week, but sector-level performance diverged sharply. Semiconductors (SOXX) spiked +4.5% on soaring AI chip demand, healthcare (XLV) rose +2.8% on defensive positioning, and energy (XLE) fell -3.1% as oil prices declined. This stark divergence among sectors presents investors with an opportunity to shift from a QQQ-centric portfolio toward a sector ETF rotation strategy. Use a rebalancing calculator to review your QQQ and sector ETF allocations, and leverage an asset allocation calculator to simulate the risk-return profile of a diversified sector portfolio and identify your optimal sector mix.
Big Tech Earnings Recap and QQQ Performance Analysis
Q3 2025 Big Tech results reflected two opposing themes: expanding AI investment and slowing consumer spending. Apple reported revenue of $89.3 billion (+2.1% year-over-year), missing the $91 billion consensus estimate. iPhone 16 sales disappointed and concerns about market share losses in China were highlighted. However, the Services segment (App Store and AppleCare) grew +8.5%, confirming a stable recurring revenue stream. The stock fell -2.1% post-earnings. Microsoft posted revenue of $56.4 billion (+13.2%), with Azure cloud growth of +29% — solid, but below the +32% market expectation. AI-related revenue jumped +45% quarter-over-quarter, surpassing $10 billion, and the CEO projected that AI revenue would overtake cloud by 2026. The stock surged +3.5% after earnings. Alphabet reported $76.6 billion in revenue (+11.8%), driven by recovering search ad revenue (+9.5%) and booming YouTube ad growth (+18.2%). The rollout of AI-powered search (Search Generative Experience) lifted both click-through rates and ad pricing simultaneously. The cloud segment also grew +35%, gaining market share. The stock jumped +5.8%. QQQ gained +1.2% for the week, but the spread between holdings was wide: the top 10 stocks (Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia, etc.) rose +2.5%, while the remaining 90 names gained just +0.3%. QQQ's sector composition — Technology (software and semiconductors) at 60%, Communication Services (Google and Meta) at 18%, and Consumer Discretionary (Amazon and Tesla) at 15% — is heavily tech-concentrated, meaning semiconductor strength was the primary driver of QQQ's return. Use a rebalancing calculator to check whether QQQ has drifted from your target allocation, and consider trimming if QQQ's rally has pushed it above its target weight.
Semiconductors and Healthcare Strength: Where the Opportunities Lie
The semiconductor sector (SOXX) surged +4.5% for the week on expanding AI infrastructure investment, significantly outperforming QQQ. Nvidia reported Q3 data center revenue up +94% as GPU demand skyrocketed, with pre-orders for its next-generation Blackwell chips exceeding $10 billion, prompting an upward revision of its 2026 outlook. AMD's AI chip MI300 series saw mass deployment by Meta and Microsoft, driving AI revenue up +150%. Intel jumped +8.2% as its announced plans to spin off its foundry business sparked restructuring optimism. SOXX is up +62% year-to-date in 2025, far outpacing QQQ (+35%). While further upside is possible if the AI supercycle continues, valuation risk (average P/E of 35x) and China export restriction exposure remain key concerns. For SOXX positioning, consider limiting exposure to 5–10% of your portfolio to capture the AI theme while managing the higher volatility — roughly 1.5x that of QQQ. If SOXX's rally has pushed it above your target weight, consider taking partial profits. Healthcare (XLV) rose +2.8% on defensive demand, delivering steady performance. Eli Lilly's weight-loss drug (tirzepatide) crossed $4 billion in quarterly revenue, significantly beating expectations, and the company raised its 2026 revenue guidance to $20 billion — sending shares up +9.5%. Johnson & Johnson delivered stable returns through medical device segment growth (+8.2%) and a dividend increase (+4.2%). UnitedHealth saw revenue rise +11% on growing Medicare enrollment. XLV is up +18% year-to-date versus the S&P 500's +22%, slightly lagging but at roughly half the volatility. The long-term growth case remains intact, supported by aging demographics and expanding drug pipelines. For XLV, consider a 10–15% portfolio allocation to pursue defensive positioning and steady dividends, and increase the weighting during periods of elevated market volatility to improve downside protection. Use a rebalancing calculator to monitor SOXX and XLV drift versus targets, and use an asset allocation calculator to compare the Sharpe ratio of a 30% QQQ portfolio against a diversified mix (e.g., 10% SOXX + 10% XLV + 10% QQQ) to quantify the benefits of sector diversification.
Sector Rotation Strategy: Navigating the Business Cycle
Sector performance varies meaningfully across the business cycle, making rotation strategies an effective tool for maximizing returns. In early expansion (the current phase), Technology (XLK / QQQ) and Financials (XLF) tend to outperform. Rate stabilization and improving corporate earnings favor tech leadership, while banks benefit from rising loan volumes. A suggested allocation is: Technology 30%, Financials 10%, Bonds 20%, Other 40%. In mid-expansion, Industrials (XLI) and Consumer Discretionary (XLY) come into focus. Rising capital expenditures and consumer spending drive outperformance in these sectors, while technology begins to moderate as valuations stretch. A suggested allocation is: Industrials 15%, Consumer Discretionary 15%, Technology 20%, Bonds 15%, Other 35%. In late expansion, Energy (XLE) and Materials (XLB) lead as inflationary pressures lift commodity prices and boost earnings for energy and materials companies, while technology faces headwinds from higher interest rates. A suggested allocation is: Energy 10%, Materials 10%, Technology 15%, Bonds 25%, Other 40%. In recession, Healthcare (XLV) and Consumer Staples (XLP) serve as defensive anchors. Defensive stocks outperform on a relative basis during downturns, and dividend payers (Utilities and REITs) also provide stable income. A suggested allocation is: Healthcare 20%, Consumer Staples 15%, Bonds 35%, Other 30%. As of October 2025, the economy appears to be transitioning from early to mid-expansion. The recommended approach is to maintain a technology overweight (QQQ at 25%) while gradually adding Industrials (5%) and Healthcare (10%) to prepare for the cycle shift. Keep Energy and Materials limited to 0–5% until signs of renewed inflation emerge. Use a rebalancing calculator to set sector weight targets for each phase of the business cycle and conduct quarterly reviews to rebalance as conditions evolve. An asset allocation calculator can simulate portfolio returns across different cycle phases to help identify the optimal sector mix and timing.
QQQ vs. Diversified Sector Portfolio: A Performance Comparison
Comparing a QQQ-only portfolio against a diversified sector approach reveals clear trade-offs. A QQQ-only portfolio (30% allocation) delivered a 2025 year-to-date return of +35%, with a maximum drawdown (MDD) of -12% and volatility of 25%. It excels when Nasdaq is in a bull run but suffers significant losses during tech corrections, and its high sector concentration limits diversification benefits. A diversified sector portfolio (QQQ 15%, SOXX 5%, XLV 10%, XLF 5%, AGG 20%, Other 45%) delivered a 2025 year-to-date return of +28%, with MDD of -8% and volatility of 18%. While absolute returns trail QQQ, both volatility and drawdown are substantially lower. Sector diversification helps cushion sharp declines in any single area, and risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio) favor the diversified approach. Looking at longer-term performance (2020–2025), the QQQ-only approach returned an annualized +16.5% with 28% volatility and a Sharpe ratio of 0.59, compared to +14.2% annualized, 19% volatility, and a Sharpe ratio of 0.75 for the diversified approach — confirming the diversified portfolio's superiority on a risk-adjusted basis. Recommended strategies by investor profile: Aggressive investors (30s–40s) should consider QQQ 25% + SOXX 10% + other sectors 15% + bonds 15% + other 35%, tilting toward growth through higher tech exposure. Balanced investors (40s–50s) may prefer QQQ 15% + diversified sectors 25% + bonds 25% + other 35%, blending growth and stability. Conservative investors (60s and above) can prioritize stability with QQQ 10% + XLV 15% + XLP 10% + bonds 40% + other 25%, centering on defensive equities and fixed income. Use a rebalancing calculator to review current weights across the QQQ-only and diversified sector scenarios, and use an asset allocation calculator to simulate volatility, Sharpe ratio, and maximum drawdown for both strategies to determine which approach fits your goals.
Key Risks and Risk Management for Sector ETF Investing
Several risks require active management when investing in sector ETFs. First, concentration risk: sector ETFs focus on a single industry, meaning a sector-specific downturn can result in significant losses. SOXX, for example, could fall 30% or more during a semiconductor industry downturn. Limit exposure to any single sector to 10% or less to spread risk. Second, timing risk: sector rotation depends on accurately forecasting the business cycle, and mistimed rotations can lead to underperformance. Since cycle turning points are difficult to predict precisely, use a gradual rebalancing approach — phasing in changes over three months rather than all at once. Third, transaction costs: frequent sector rotation generates trading costs and tax drag that accumulate over time. Rotating more than four times per year can erode 1–2 percentage points of returns. Limit trading frequency by conducting quarterly or semi-annual reviews. Fourth, valuation risk: entering a sector late in a rally means buying at stretched valuations and risking a pullback. SOXX's current P/E of 35x is meaningfully above its historical average of 25x, indicating elevated correction risk. Use valuation metrics (P/E, P/B comparisons) to assess entry timing. Sector ETF rebalancing guidelines: For scheduled reviews, rebalance when any sector drifts more than ±3 percentage points from its target at quarter-end. For sharp moves, adjust immediately if a single sector moves ±10% or more within a week. For new cash, prioritize purchasing underweight sectors when adding new capital to reduce unnecessary trading costs. Use a rebalancing calculator to define target weights (e.g., QQQ 15%, SOXX 5%, XLV 10%) and trigger bands (±3 pp) for each sector, and use quarterly reviews to confirm whether rebalancing is needed. An asset allocation calculator can simulate how portfolio volatility and returns shift as sector weights change, helping you fine-tune your optimal allocation.
Conclusion
Big Tech earnings season has highlighted the widening performance gap between sectors, presenting a clear opportunity to transition from a QQQ-only approach toward a more diversified sector strategy. Semiconductors (SOXX) remain in a strong uptrend on the back of AI investment expansion, though valuation pressures warrant caution. Healthcare (XLV) continues to deliver stable returns on defensive demand. Use a rebalancing calculator to review your sector weightings and an asset allocation calculator to simulate sector allocation strategies across different phases of the business cycle — so you can build a portfolio that is truly suited to your goals and risk tolerance.