미국 ETF/주식SMHETF

VanEck Semiconductor ETF 계산기

SMH is an ETF profile used to attach reviewed context to calculator entry flows.

비중을 볼 때 확인할 점

  • Used to provide reviewed context in portfolio calculator entry flows.
  • Check exposure, costs, and overlap before using it in a portfolio.

리밸런싱 전 리스크

  • It can lose value depending on market conditions.
  • Costs, concentration, and tracking behavior should be reviewed before use.

계산기에서 확인하는 순서

  1. 1.VanEck Semiconductor ETF를 포트폴리오에 추가합니다.
  2. 2.보유 수량, 현금, 목표 비중을 입력합니다.
  3. 3.목표보다 과대·과소 편입인지 보고 매수·매도 필요 수량을 확인합니다.

비중 계산 기준

리밸런싱 계산기는 VanEck Semiconductor ETF의 현재 평가금액, 포트폴리오 현금, 다른 보유 종목의 평가금액을 함께 놓고 목표 비중과의 차이를 계산합니다. 실제 주문 수량은 현재가, 환율, 거래 수수료, 최소 주문 단위에 따라 달라질 수 있으므로 결과를 주문 전 점검용으로 사용하세요.

이 페이지를 쓰는 상황

신규 매수 전 목표 비중을 정하거나, VanEck Semiconductor ETF 비중이 커진 뒤 일부를 줄일지 확인할 때 유용합니다. 여러 종목을 함께 보유한다면 단일 수익률보다 전체 포트폴리오에서 차지하는 비중과 변동성 기여도를 먼저 확인하는 편이 안전합니다.

SMH vs VGT: Which ETF Is Better in 2026?

Compare SMH vs VGT by expense ratio, dividend yield, holdings, portfolio role, and rebalancing use case. See which ETF fits your 2026 portfolio.

Quick Verdict

SMH vs VGT at a glance

Open rebalancing calculator

Verdict

VGT

VGT has an overall advantage with lower expense ratio (0.1% vs 0.35%), higher dividend yield (0.6% vs 0.5%). However, SMH also offers Benefits from AI growth, making it worth considering depending on your portfolio goals.

Lower fee

VGT

0.10%

Higher yield

VGT

0.60%

Broader holdings

VGT

316

Compare These ETFs in the Rebalancing Calculator

Add both ETFs, set target weights, and check how much to buy or sell to keep your portfolio aligned.

Key Differences

  • 1Expense ratio: VGT 0.1% vs SMH 0.35% (VGT is 0.25%p cheaper)
  • 2Dividend yield: VGT 0.6% vs SMH 0.5%
  • 3Holdings: SMH 26 vs VGT 316
  • 4Issuer: SMH (VanEck) vs VGT (Vanguard)

Conclusion

Recommended:VGT

VGT has an overall advantage with lower expense ratio (0.1% vs 0.35%), higher dividend yield (0.6% vs 0.5%). However, SMH also offers Benefits from AI growth, making it worth considering depending on your portfolio goals.

Comparison Snapshot

Use the table below to compare cost, income, diversification, and portfolio role before making an allocation decision.

CategorySMHVGT
Fund NameVanEck Semiconductor ETFVanguard Information Technology ETF
Current Price......
CategorySector ETFsSector ETFs
Expense Ratio0.35%0.1%
Dividend Yield0.5%0.6%
Holdings26316

SMH Top Holdings

  1. 1. Nvidia
  2. 2. TSMC
  3. 3. Broadcom
  4. 4. ASML

VGT Top Holdings

  1. 1. Apple
  2. 2. Microsoft
  3. 3. Nvidia
  4. 4. Visa

SMH Features

  • Semiconductor investing
  • Benefits from AI
  • Concentrated portfolio
  • Global semiconductors

VGT Features

  • Technology stock investing
  • Growth stock focused
  • Innovative companies
  • Wide range of holdings

Pros & Cons

SMH

Advantages
  • Benefits from AI growth
  • Core semiconductor companies
  • High growth rate
Disadvantages
  • Sector concentration risk
  • Cyclical volatility
  • High valuation

VGT

Advantages
  • Technology sector concentration
  • More diverse holdings than XLK
  • Low expense ratio
Disadvantages
  • Sector concentration risk
  • High valuation
  • Interest rate sensitive

Investment Strategy

Best For: SMH

Satellite strategy at 5-10%; alternative to SOXX

Best For: VGT

Allocate 10-20% to tech sector; alternative to XLK

Detailed Analysis

1. 분석

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) Both belong to the Sector ETFs category, covering a similar investment area but with different strategies. SMH: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to specific industry sectors. It carries an expense ratio of 0.35%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 0.50%. The portfolio holds 26 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.35% and dividend yield of 0.5%, its top holdings include Nvidia, TSMC, Broadcom. Key features include Semiconductor investing, Benefits from AI, with Benefits from AI growth being a major advantage. VGT: Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to specific industry sectors. It carries an expense ratio of 0.10%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 0.60%. The portfolio holds 316 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.1% and dividend yield of 0.6%, top holdings include Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia. Notable features are Technology stock investing, Growth stock focused, with Technology sector concentration as a core strength. In terms of expense ratio, VGT is 0.25%p cheaper, which can lead to significant cost savings through compounding over long-term investment. Over 20 years with a $100,000 investment, this difference can amount to thousands of dollars.

2. 추천

SMH is suitable for Satellite strategy at 5-10%; alternative to SOXX, while VGT is suitable for Allocate 10-20% to tech sector; alternative to XLK. Since both ETFs are in the same category, choosing one for your portfolio is more efficient. Base your decision on expense ratio, liquidity, and issuer preference. For beginners, we recommend a core-satellite strategy: choose a low-cost, well-diversified ETF as your core holding, and allocate the rest to satellite positions.

3. 결론

Both SMH and VGT are excellent ETFs for their respective investment objectives. The key is to choose based on your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. Rather than focusing on a single metric (dividend yield, fees, etc.), evaluate from a holistic portfolio perspective. Use our rebalancing calculator to easily determine the optimal asset allocation including both ETFs.

SMH vs VGT Investment Guide

Both SMH and VGT are popular US ETFs, but they differ in investment strategy and portfolio role. SMH has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while VGT charges 0.1%, giving VGT a cost advantage. In terms of dividend yield, SMH offers 0.5% while VGT offers 0.6%, making VGT the better choice for income investors.

When choosing between the two, consider your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. If long-term growth is your priority, favor the ETF with lower fees and broader diversification. If you need steady cash flow, the higher-yielding ETF may be more suitable. You can also hold both in your portfolio for a complementary approach.

Regardless of which ETF you choose, maintaining your target allocation through regular rebalancing is key to long-term performance. Review your portfolio quarterly or semi-annually, and adjust if weights have drifted significantly. Our rebalancing calculator can automatically determine the buy/sell quantities for each holding.

5 Things to Check When Comparing ETFs

1.

Expense Ratio: Even a 0.1% difference in fees can translate to thousands of dollars over long-term investing. When two ETFs track a similar index, the lower-cost option has the edge.

2.

Tracking Index & Holdings: Even ETFs in the same category may track different indices. Review the top holdings and sector weights to find the best fit for your investment goals.

3.

Dividend Policy: Compare dividend frequency (monthly vs quarterly), yield, and dividend growth rate. Monthly dividend ETFs may be preferable if you need regular cash flow.

4.

Trading Volume & Liquidity: Sufficient daily trading volume ensures you can buy and sell at fair prices. Low-volume ETFs may have wider bid-ask spreads, increasing your trading costs.

5.

Portfolio Role: Determine whether the ETF serves as a core or satellite holding in your portfolio, and size your position accordingly.

Apply with the Rebalancing Calculator

Automatically calculate exactly how much to buy and sell to rebalance your portfolio.

Start Rebalancing Calculator