SMH vs VGT: VanEck Semiconductor ETF vs Vanguard Information Technology ETF Comparison
Compare SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) by expense ratio, dividend yield, holdings, and more.
Key Differences
- 1Expense ratio: VGT 0.1% vs SMH 0.35% (VGT is 0.25%p cheaper)
- 2Dividend yield: VGT 0.6% vs SMH 0.5%
- 3Holdings: SMH 26 vs VGT 316
- 4Issuer: SMH (VanEck) vs VGT (Vanguard)
Conclusion
VGT has an overall advantage with lower expense ratio (0.1% vs 0.35%), higher dividend yield (0.6% vs 0.5%). However, SMH also offers Benefits from AI growth, making it worth considering depending on your portfolio goals.
| Category | SMH | VGT |
|---|---|---|
| Fund Name | VanEck Semiconductor ETF | Vanguard Information Technology ETF |
| Current Price | ... | ... |
| Category | Sector ETFs | Sector ETFs |
| Expense Ratio | 0.35% | 0.1% |
| Dividend Yield | 0.5% | 0.6% |
| Holdings | 26 | 316 |
SMH Top Holdings
- 1. Nvidia
- 2. TSMC
- 3. Broadcom
- 4. ASML
VGT Top Holdings
- 1. Apple
- 2. Microsoft
- 3. Nvidia
- 4. Visa
SMH Features
- •Semiconductor investing
- •Benefits from AI
- •Concentrated portfolio
- •Global semiconductors
VGT Features
- •Technology stock investing
- •Growth stock focused
- •Innovative companies
- •Wide range of holdings
Pros & Cons
SMH
Advantages
- ✓ Benefits from AI growth
- ✓ Core semiconductor companies
- ✓ High growth rate
Disadvantages
- ⚠ Sector concentration risk
- ⚠ Cyclical volatility
- ⚠ High valuation
VGT
Advantages
- ✓ Technology sector concentration
- ✓ More diverse holdings than XLK
- ✓ Low expense ratio
Disadvantages
- ⚠ Sector concentration risk
- ⚠ High valuation
- ⚠ Interest rate sensitive
Investment Strategy
Best For: SMH
Satellite strategy at 5-10%; alternative to SOXX
Best For: VGT
Allocate 10-20% to tech sector; alternative to XLK
Detailed Analysis
SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) Both belong to the Sector ETFs category, covering a similar investment area but with different strategies. SMH: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to specific industry sectors. It carries an expense ratio of 0.35%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 0.50%. The portfolio holds 26 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.35% and dividend yield of 0.5%, its top holdings include Nvidia, TSMC, Broadcom. Key features include Semiconductor investing, Benefits from AI, with Benefits from AI growth being a major advantage. VGT: Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to specific industry sectors. It carries an expense ratio of 0.10%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 0.60%. The portfolio holds 316 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.1% and dividend yield of 0.6%, top holdings include Apple, Microsoft, Nvidia. Notable features are Technology stock investing, Growth stock focused, with Technology sector concentration as a core strength. In terms of expense ratio, VGT is 0.25%p cheaper, which can lead to significant cost savings through compounding over long-term investment. Over 20 years with a $100,000 investment, this difference can amount to thousands of dollars.
Investment Recommendation
SMH is suitable for Satellite strategy at 5-10%; alternative to SOXX, while VGT is suitable for Allocate 10-20% to tech sector; alternative to XLK. Since both ETFs are in the same category, choosing one for your portfolio is more efficient. Base your decision on expense ratio, liquidity, and issuer preference. For beginners, we recommend a core-satellite strategy: choose a low-cost, well-diversified ETF as your core holding, and allocate the rest to satellite positions.
Key Summary
Both SMH and VGT are excellent ETFs for their respective investment objectives. The key is to choose based on your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. Rather than focusing on a single metric (dividend yield, fees, etc.), evaluate from a holistic portfolio perspective. Use our rebalancing calculator to easily determine the optimal asset allocation including both ETFs.
SMH vs VGT Investment Guide
Both SMH and VGT are popular US ETFs, but they differ in investment strategy and portfolio role. SMH has an expense ratio of 0.35%, while VGT charges 0.1%, giving VGT a cost advantage. In terms of dividend yield, SMH offers 0.5% while VGT offers 0.6%, making VGT the better choice for income investors.
When choosing between the two, consider your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. If long-term growth is your priority, favor the ETF with lower fees and broader diversification. If you need steady cash flow, the higher-yielding ETF may be more suitable. You can also hold both in your portfolio for a complementary approach.
Regardless of which ETF you choose, maintaining your target allocation through regular rebalancing is key to long-term performance. Review your portfolio quarterly or semi-annually, and adjust if weights have drifted significantly. Our rebalancing calculator can automatically determine the buy/sell quantities for each holding.
5 Things to Check When Comparing ETFs
Expense Ratio: Even a 0.1% difference in fees can translate to thousands of dollars over long-term investing. When two ETFs track a similar index, the lower-cost option has the edge.
Tracking Index & Holdings: Even ETFs in the same category may track different indices. Review the top holdings and sector weights to find the best fit for your investment goals.
Dividend Policy: Compare dividend frequency (monthly vs quarterly), yield, and dividend growth rate. Monthly dividend ETFs may be preferable if you need regular cash flow.
Trading Volume & Liquidity: Sufficient daily trading volume ensures you can buy and sell at fair prices. Low-volume ETFs may have wider bid-ask spreads, increasing your trading costs.
Portfolio Role: Determine whether the ETF serves as a core or satellite holding in your portfolio, and size your position accordingly.