Initializing...0%

Calculator Guide

Review the individual and group portfolio flows screen by screen.

Open guide and empty state mobile guide image

Screen 1

Open guide and empty state

Review the individual portfolio flow even when no portfolio exists or data is still loading.

QYLD vs IWM: Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF vs iShares Russell 2000 ETF Comparison

Compare QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) by expense ratio, dividend yield, holdings, and more.

Key Differences

  • 1Expense ratio: IWM 0.19% vs QYLD 0.6% (IWM is 0.41%p cheaper)
  • 2Dividend yield: QYLD 11.82% vs IWM 1.24%
  • 3Category: QYLD is Income / Covered Call, IWM is Small Cap
  • 4Holdings: QYLD 103 vs IWM 1,990
  • 5Issuer: QYLD (Global X) vs IWM (BlackRock(iShares))

Conclusion

Recommended:Depends on your goals

QYLD and IWM each have different strengths, so the choice depends on your investment objectives. Choose the one with lower fees if cost is a priority, or the one with higher yield if income is your goal.

CategoryQYLDIWM
Fund NameGlobal X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETFiShares Russell 2000 ETF
Current Price......
CategoryIncome / Covered CallSmall Cap
Expense Ratio0.6%0.19%
Dividend Yield11.82%1.24%
Holdings1031990

QYLD Top Holdings

  1. 1. Nasdaq 100 Stocks + Covered Call Writing

IWM Top Holdings

  1. 1. Super Micro Computer
  2. 2. MicroStrategy
  3. 3. Comfort Systems

QYLD Features

  • Monthly dividends
  • Covered call
  • High income
  • Limited upside

IWM Features

  • Small-cap specialized
  • Growth potential
  • Tracks the Russell 2000
  • High volatility

Pros & Cons

QYLD

Advantages
  • High monthly dividends
  • Reduced volatility
  • Bear market defense
Disadvantages
  • Limited upside returns
  • Potential principal loss
  • Tax inefficiency

IWM

Advantages
  • Captures small-cap growth
  • Benefits from economic recovery
  • M&A premium
Disadvantages
  • High volatility
  • Liquidity risk
  • Economically sensitive

Investment Strategy

Best For: QYLD

For retirement income; bear market preparation; 10-20% of total portfolio

Best For: IWM

Allocate 10-20% of total portfolio; adjust based on business cycle

Detailed Analysis

1. 분석

QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) They belong to different categories — Income / Covered Call and Small Cap — representing distinct investment areas. QYLD: Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to income generation through covered call and option strategies. It carries an expense ratio of 0.60%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 11.82%. The portfolio holds 103 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.6% and dividend yield of 11.82%, its top holdings include Nasdaq 100 Stocks + Covered Call Writing. Key features include Monthly dividends, Covered call, with High monthly dividends being a major advantage. IWM: iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to small-capitalization companies. It carries an expense ratio of 0.19%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 1.24%. The portfolio holds 1990 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.19% and dividend yield of 1.24%, top holdings include Super Micro Computer, MicroStrategy, Comfort Systems. Notable features are Small-cap specialized, Growth potential, with Captures small-cap growth as a core strength. In terms of expense ratio, IWM is 0.41%p cheaper, which can lead to significant cost savings through compounding over long-term investment. Over 20 years with a $100,000 investment, this difference can amount to thousands of dollars.

2. 추천

QYLD is suitable for For retirement income; bear market preparation; 10-20% of total portfolio, while IWM is suitable for Allocate 10-20% of total portfolio; adjust based on business cycle. Since they are in different categories, holding both can provide portfolio diversification benefits. Adjust the allocation based on your risk tolerance and investment horizon. For beginners, we recommend a core-satellite strategy: choose a low-cost, well-diversified ETF as your core holding, and allocate the rest to satellite positions.

3. 결론

Both QYLD and IWM are excellent ETFs for their respective investment objectives. The key is to choose based on your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. Rather than focusing on a single metric (dividend yield, fees, etc.), evaluate from a holistic portfolio perspective. Use our rebalancing calculator to easily determine the optimal asset allocation including both ETFs.

QYLD vs IWM Investment Guide

Both QYLD and IWM are popular US ETFs, but they differ in investment strategy and portfolio role. QYLD has an expense ratio of 0.6%, while IWM charges 0.19%, giving IWM a cost advantage. In terms of dividend yield, QYLD offers 11.82% while IWM offers 1.24%, making QYLD the better choice for income investors.

When choosing between the two, consider your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. If long-term growth is your priority, favor the ETF with lower fees and broader diversification. If you need steady cash flow, the higher-yielding ETF may be more suitable. You can also hold both in your portfolio for a complementary approach.

Regardless of which ETF you choose, maintaining your target allocation through regular rebalancing is key to long-term performance. Review your portfolio quarterly or semi-annually, and adjust if weights have drifted significantly. Our rebalancing calculator can automatically determine the buy/sell quantities for each holding.

5 Things to Check When Comparing ETFs

1.

Expense Ratio: Even a 0.1% difference in fees can translate to thousands of dollars over long-term investing. When two ETFs track a similar index, the lower-cost option has the edge.

2.

Tracking Index & Holdings: Even ETFs in the same category may track different indices. Review the top holdings and sector weights to find the best fit for your investment goals.

3.

Dividend Policy: Compare dividend frequency (monthly vs quarterly), yield, and dividend growth rate. Monthly dividend ETFs may be preferable if you need regular cash flow.

4.

Trading Volume & Liquidity: Sufficient daily trading volume ensures you can buy and sell at fair prices. Low-volume ETFs may have wider bid-ask spreads, increasing your trading costs.

5.

Portfolio Role: Determine whether the ETF serves as a core or satellite holding in your portfolio, and size your position accordingly.

Apply with the Rebalancing Calculator

Automatically calculate exactly how much to buy and sell to rebalance your portfolio.

Start Rebalancing Calculator