미국 ETF/주식GLDETF

SPDR Gold Shares 계산기

GLD is an ETF profile used to attach reviewed context to calculator entry flows.

비중을 볼 때 확인할 점

  • Used to provide reviewed context in portfolio calculator entry flows.
  • Check exposure, costs, and overlap before using it in a portfolio.

리밸런싱 전 리스크

  • It can lose value depending on market conditions.
  • Costs, concentration, and tracking behavior should be reviewed before use.

계산기에서 확인하는 순서

  1. 1.SPDR Gold Shares를 포트폴리오에 추가합니다.
  2. 2.보유 수량, 현금, 목표 비중을 입력합니다.
  3. 3.목표보다 과대·과소 편입인지 보고 매수·매도 필요 수량을 확인합니다.

비중 계산 기준

리밸런싱 계산기는 SPDR Gold Shares의 현재 평가금액, 포트폴리오 현금, 다른 보유 종목의 평가금액을 함께 놓고 목표 비중과의 차이를 계산합니다. 실제 주문 수량은 현재가, 환율, 거래 수수료, 최소 주문 단위에 따라 달라질 수 있으므로 결과를 주문 전 점검용으로 사용하세요.

이 페이지를 쓰는 상황

신규 매수 전 목표 비중을 정하거나, SPDR Gold Shares 비중이 커진 뒤 일부를 줄일지 확인할 때 유용합니다. 여러 종목을 함께 보유한다면 단일 수익률보다 전체 포트폴리오에서 차지하는 비중과 변동성 기여도를 먼저 확인하는 편이 안전합니다.

리밸런싱 계산기로 이동종목 비중 최적화

GLD vs TLT: Which ETF Is Better in 2026?

Compare GLD vs TLT by expense ratio, dividend yield, holdings, portfolio role, and rebalancing use case. See which ETF fits your 2026 portfolio.

Quick Verdict

GLD vs TLT at a glance

Open rebalancing calculator

Verdict

TLT

TLT has an overall advantage with lower expense ratio (0.15% vs 0.4%), higher dividend yield (3.31% vs 0%). However, GLD also offers Portfolio hedge, making it worth considering depending on your portfolio goals.

Lower fee

TLT

0.15%

Higher yield

TLT

3.3%

Broader holdings

TLT

50

Compare These ETFs in the Rebalancing Calculator

Add both ETFs, set target weights, and check how much to buy or sell to keep your portfolio aligned.

Open rebalancing calculatorOpen GLD calculatorOpen TLT calculatorView all ETF comparisons

Key Differences

  • 1Expense ratio: TLT 0.15% vs GLD 0.4% (TLT is 0.25%p cheaper)
  • 2Dividend yield: TLT 3.31% vs GLD 0%
  • 3Holdings: GLD 1 vs TLT 50
  • 4Issuer: GLD (State Street(SPDR)) vs TLT (BlackRock(iShares))

Conclusion

Recommended:TLT

TLT has an overall advantage with lower expense ratio (0.15% vs 0.4%), higher dividend yield (3.31% vs 0%). However, GLD also offers Portfolio hedge, making it worth considering depending on your portfolio goals.

Comparison Snapshot

Use the table below to compare cost, income, diversification, and portfolio role before making an allocation decision.

CategoryGLDTLT
Fund NameSPDR Gold SharesiShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF
Current Price......
CategoryBonds & CommoditiesBonds & Commodities
Expense Ratio0.4%0.15%
Dividend Yield0%3.31%
Holdings150

GLD Top Holdings

  1. 1. Physical Gold

TLT Top Holdings

  1. 1. U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bonds
  2. 2. U.S. 20-Year Treasury Bonds

GLD Features

  • •Gold investing
  • •Safe-haven asset
  • •Inflation hedge
  • •Crisis response

TLT Features

  • •Long-term government bonds
  • •Interest rate sensitive
  • •Safe-haven asset
  • •Hedging tool

Pros & Cons

GLD

Advantages
  • ✓ Portfolio hedge
  • ✓ Inflation defense
  • ✓ Benefits from dollar weakness
Disadvantages
  • ⚠ No dividends
  • ⚠ Storage costs
  • ⚠ Opportunity cost

TLT

Advantages
  • ✓ Rises when equities fall
  • ✓ Safe-haven asset
  • ✓ Excellent liquidity
Disadvantages
  • ⚠ Rising interest rate risk
  • ⚠ Inflation risk
  • ⚠ High duration

Investment Strategy

Best For: GLD

Allocate 5-10% for crisis hedging; increase during economic uncertainty

Best For: TLT

For risk hedging; bet on falling rates; 10-20% of total portfolio

Detailed Analysis

1. 분석

GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and TLT (iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF) Both belong to the Bonds & Commodities category, covering a similar investment area but with different strategies. GLD: SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to bonds, gold, and other commodities. It carries an expense ratio of 0.40%. The portfolio holds 1 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.4% and dividend yield of 0%, its top holdings include Physical Gold. Key features include Gold investing, Safe-haven asset, with Portfolio hedge being a major advantage. TLT: iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond ETF (TLT) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to bonds, gold, and other commodities. It carries an expense ratio of 0.15%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 3.31%. The portfolio holds 50 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.15% and dividend yield of 3.31%, top holdings include U.S. 30-Year Treasury Bonds, U.S. 20-Year Treasury Bonds. Notable features are Long-term government bonds, Interest rate sensitive, with Rises when equities fall as a core strength. In terms of expense ratio, TLT is 0.25%p cheaper, which can lead to significant cost savings through compounding over long-term investment. Over 20 years with a $100,000 investment, this difference can amount to thousands of dollars.

2. 추천

GLD is suitable for Allocate 5-10% for crisis hedging; increase during economic uncertainty, while TLT is suitable for For risk hedging; bet on falling rates; 10-20% of total portfolio. Since both ETFs are in the same category, choosing one for your portfolio is more efficient. Base your decision on expense ratio, liquidity, and issuer preference. For beginners, we recommend a core-satellite strategy: choose a low-cost, well-diversified ETF as your core holding, and allocate the rest to satellite positions.

3. 결론

Both GLD and TLT are excellent ETFs for their respective investment objectives. The key is to choose based on your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. Rather than focusing on a single metric (dividend yield, fees, etc.), evaluate from a holistic portfolio perspective. Use our rebalancing calculator to easily determine the optimal asset allocation including both ETFs.

GLD vs TLT Investment Guide

Both GLD and TLT are popular US ETFs, but they differ in investment strategy and portfolio role. GLD has an expense ratio of 0.4%, while TLT charges 0.15%, giving TLT a cost advantage. In terms of dividend yield, GLD offers 0% while TLT offers 3.31%, making TLT the better choice for income investors.

When choosing between the two, consider your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. If long-term growth is your priority, favor the ETF with lower fees and broader diversification. If you need steady cash flow, the higher-yielding ETF may be more suitable. You can also hold both in your portfolio for a complementary approach.

Regardless of which ETF you choose, maintaining your target allocation through regular rebalancing is key to long-term performance. Review your portfolio quarterly or semi-annually, and adjust if weights have drifted significantly. Our rebalancing calculator can automatically determine the buy/sell quantities for each holding.

5 Things to Check When Comparing ETFs

1.

Expense Ratio: Even a 0.1% difference in fees can translate to thousands of dollars over long-term investing. When two ETFs track a similar index, the lower-cost option has the edge.

2.

Tracking Index & Holdings: Even ETFs in the same category may track different indices. Review the top holdings and sector weights to find the best fit for your investment goals.

3.

Dividend Policy: Compare dividend frequency (monthly vs quarterly), yield, and dividend growth rate. Monthly dividend ETFs may be preferable if you need regular cash flow.

4.

Trading Volume & Liquidity: Sufficient daily trading volume ensures you can buy and sell at fair prices. Low-volume ETFs may have wider bid-ask spreads, increasing your trading costs.

5.

Portfolio Role: Determine whether the ETF serves as a core or satellite holding in your portfolio, and size your position accordingly.

Apply with the Rebalancing Calculator

Automatically calculate exactly how much to buy and sell to rebalance your portfolio.

Start Rebalancing Calculator

Related Content

GLD Detail Analysis
ETF Details
TLT Detail Analysis
ETF Details
ETF Selection Guide
Investment Guide