미국 ETF/주식GLDETF

SPDR Gold Shares 계산기

GLD is an ETF profile used to attach reviewed context to calculator entry flows.

비중을 볼 때 확인할 점

  • Used to provide reviewed context in portfolio calculator entry flows.
  • Check exposure, costs, and overlap before using it in a portfolio.

리밸런싱 전 리스크

  • It can lose value depending on market conditions.
  • Costs, concentration, and tracking behavior should be reviewed before use.

계산기에서 확인하는 순서

  1. 1.SPDR Gold Shares를 포트폴리오에 추가합니다.
  2. 2.보유 수량, 현금, 목표 비중을 입력합니다.
  3. 3.목표보다 과대·과소 편입인지 보고 매수·매도 필요 수량을 확인합니다.

비중 계산 기준

리밸런싱 계산기는 SPDR Gold Shares의 현재 평가금액, 포트폴리오 현금, 다른 보유 종목의 평가금액을 함께 놓고 목표 비중과의 차이를 계산합니다. 실제 주문 수량은 현재가, 환율, 거래 수수료, 최소 주문 단위에 따라 달라질 수 있으므로 결과를 주문 전 점검용으로 사용하세요.

이 페이지를 쓰는 상황

신규 매수 전 목표 비중을 정하거나, SPDR Gold Shares 비중이 커진 뒤 일부를 줄일지 확인할 때 유용합니다. 여러 종목을 함께 보유한다면 단일 수익률보다 전체 포트폴리오에서 차지하는 비중과 변동성 기여도를 먼저 확인하는 편이 안전합니다.

리밸런싱 계산기로 이동종목 비중 최적화

GLD vs SMH: Which ETF Is Better in 2026?

Compare GLD vs SMH by expense ratio, dividend yield, holdings, portfolio role, and rebalancing use case. See which ETF fits your 2026 portfolio.

Quick Verdict

GLD vs SMH at a glance

Open rebalancing calculator

Verdict

SMH

SMH has an overall advantage with lower expense ratio (0.35% vs 0.4%), higher dividend yield (0.5% vs 0%). However, GLD also offers Portfolio hedge, making it worth considering depending on your portfolio goals.

Lower fee

SMH

0.35%

Higher yield

SMH

0.50%

Broader holdings

SMH

26

Compare These ETFs in the Rebalancing Calculator

Add both ETFs, set target weights, and check how much to buy or sell to keep your portfolio aligned.

Open rebalancing calculatorOpen GLD calculatorOpen SMH calculatorView all ETF comparisons

Key Differences

  • 1Expense ratio: SMH 0.35% vs GLD 0.4% (SMH is 0.05%p cheaper)
  • 2Dividend yield: SMH 0.5% vs GLD 0%
  • 3Category: GLD is Bonds & Commodities, SMH is Sector ETFs
  • 4Holdings: GLD 1 vs SMH 26
  • 5Issuer: GLD (State Street(SPDR)) vs SMH (VanEck)

Conclusion

Recommended:SMH

SMH has an overall advantage with lower expense ratio (0.35% vs 0.4%), higher dividend yield (0.5% vs 0%). However, GLD also offers Portfolio hedge, making it worth considering depending on your portfolio goals.

Comparison Snapshot

Use the table below to compare cost, income, diversification, and portfolio role before making an allocation decision.

CategoryGLDSMH
Fund NameSPDR Gold SharesVanEck Semiconductor ETF
Current Price......
CategoryBonds & CommoditiesSector ETFs
Expense Ratio0.4%0.35%
Dividend Yield0%0.5%
Holdings126

GLD Top Holdings

  1. 1. Physical Gold

SMH Top Holdings

  1. 1. Nvidia
  2. 2. TSMC
  3. 3. Broadcom
  4. 4. ASML

GLD Features

  • •Gold investing
  • •Safe-haven asset
  • •Inflation hedge
  • •Crisis response

SMH Features

  • •Semiconductor investing
  • •Benefits from AI
  • •Concentrated portfolio
  • •Global semiconductors

Pros & Cons

GLD

Advantages
  • ✓ Portfolio hedge
  • ✓ Inflation defense
  • ✓ Benefits from dollar weakness
Disadvantages
  • ⚠ No dividends
  • ⚠ Storage costs
  • ⚠ Opportunity cost

SMH

Advantages
  • ✓ Benefits from AI growth
  • ✓ Core semiconductor companies
  • ✓ High growth rate
Disadvantages
  • ⚠ Sector concentration risk
  • ⚠ Cyclical volatility
  • ⚠ High valuation

Investment Strategy

Best For: GLD

Allocate 5-10% for crisis hedging; increase during economic uncertainty

Best For: SMH

Satellite strategy at 5-10%; alternative to SOXX

Detailed Analysis

1. 분석

GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) They belong to different categories — Bonds & Commodities and Sector ETFs — representing distinct investment areas. GLD: SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to bonds, gold, and other commodities. It carries an expense ratio of 0.40%. The portfolio holds 1 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.4% and dividend yield of 0%, its top holdings include Physical Gold. Key features include Gold investing, Safe-haven asset, with Portfolio hedge being a major advantage. SMH: VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) is an exchange-traded fund that provides investors with exposure to specific industry sectors. It carries an expense ratio of 0.35%. The fund offers a dividend yield of approximately 0.50%. The portfolio holds 26 securities. With an expense ratio of 0.35% and dividend yield of 0.5%, top holdings include Nvidia, TSMC, Broadcom. Notable features are Semiconductor investing, Benefits from AI, with Benefits from AI growth as a core strength. In terms of expense ratio, SMH is 0.05%p cheaper, which can lead to significant cost savings through compounding over long-term investment. Over 20 years with a $100,000 investment, this difference can amount to thousands of dollars.

2. 추천

GLD is suitable for Allocate 5-10% for crisis hedging; increase during economic uncertainty, while SMH is suitable for Satellite strategy at 5-10%; alternative to SOXX. Since they are in different categories, holding both can provide portfolio diversification benefits. Adjust the allocation based on your risk tolerance and investment horizon. For beginners, we recommend a core-satellite strategy: choose a low-cost, well-diversified ETF as your core holding, and allocate the rest to satellite positions.

3. 결론

Both GLD and SMH are excellent ETFs for their respective investment objectives. The key is to choose based on your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. Rather than focusing on a single metric (dividend yield, fees, etc.), evaluate from a holistic portfolio perspective. Use our rebalancing calculator to easily determine the optimal asset allocation including both ETFs.

GLD vs SMH Investment Guide

Both GLD and SMH are popular US ETFs, but they differ in investment strategy and portfolio role. GLD has an expense ratio of 0.4%, while SMH charges 0.35%, giving SMH a cost advantage. In terms of dividend yield, GLD offers 0% while SMH offers 0.5%, making SMH the better choice for income investors.

When choosing between the two, consider your investment goals, time horizon, and risk tolerance. If long-term growth is your priority, favor the ETF with lower fees and broader diversification. If you need steady cash flow, the higher-yielding ETF may be more suitable. You can also hold both in your portfolio for a complementary approach.

Regardless of which ETF you choose, maintaining your target allocation through regular rebalancing is key to long-term performance. Review your portfolio quarterly or semi-annually, and adjust if weights have drifted significantly. Our rebalancing calculator can automatically determine the buy/sell quantities for each holding.

5 Things to Check When Comparing ETFs

1.

Expense Ratio: Even a 0.1% difference in fees can translate to thousands of dollars over long-term investing. When two ETFs track a similar index, the lower-cost option has the edge.

2.

Tracking Index & Holdings: Even ETFs in the same category may track different indices. Review the top holdings and sector weights to find the best fit for your investment goals.

3.

Dividend Policy: Compare dividend frequency (monthly vs quarterly), yield, and dividend growth rate. Monthly dividend ETFs may be preferable if you need regular cash flow.

4.

Trading Volume & Liquidity: Sufficient daily trading volume ensures you can buy and sell at fair prices. Low-volume ETFs may have wider bid-ask spreads, increasing your trading costs.

5.

Portfolio Role: Determine whether the ETF serves as a core or satellite holding in your portfolio, and size your position accordingly.

Apply with the Rebalancing Calculator

Automatically calculate exactly how much to buy and sell to rebalance your portfolio.

Start Rebalancing Calculator

Related Content

GLD Detail Analysis
ETF Details
SMH Detail Analysis
ETF Details
ETF Selection Guide
Investment Guide